Mailing-List: contact dev-help@tomcat.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: "Tomcat Developers List" <dev@tomcat.apache.org>
Received-SPF: pass (herse.apache.org: domain of jfclere@gmail.com designates
 66.249.82.228 as permitted sender)
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws;
        d=gmail.com; s=beta;
        h=received:subject:from:to:in-reply-to:references:content-type:date:message-id:mime-version:x-mailer:content-transfer-encoding;
        b=CDDTl8vk9tSG/ltGOVk8PEp1oQ7IK6mCVL54LGFHE98snpbLlTvpPytMTuZr3vDHqbUwzdXN03DHxE9p+IWielfRea0R/OoesVnmzJJHZuuuU5GdTQjIWAkoH9bMGy2QIJ/alWZrcusUZngvsl6PeXV25yMAjo0WU/FjbTJlXoA=
Subject: Re: More on i5/OS and some modifications needed
From: Jean-Frederic <jfclere@gmail.com>
To: Tomcat Developers List <dev@tomcat.apache.org>
In-Reply-To: <6291fc850705160117v284b69bbo56f0b5bc6a5c564e@mail.gmail.com>
References: <3iGbeK7K29xXqpTGf302BA6QWrBhemCTbwRoOY5aUrS@akmail>
	 <n7iuDbvSOXmj0rhstDr6lnBWbYZbu08PnzbswtGKmR8@akmail>
	 <dcBhHsJpcfDApt4rcmVpcozLJq2NHTdUShiohjzv2He@akmail>
	 <6291fc850704231508o7b5bd5eaofb4942ceec3a48e8@mail.gmail.com>
	 <6291fc850704240201m6e076c9chdb849efd36e8d9ba@mail.gmail.com>
	 <462DCFCF.2040405@kippdata.de>
	 <6291fc850704240301y521a60d1q464f8ab51de8a147@mail.gmail.com>
	 <6291fc850704240315g30173979nd55131d7c9a05a3c@mail.gmail.com>
	 <462DFFFB.4020801@kippdata.de>
	 <6291fc850704240616y7a72088bv1fa2ab342918ca3a@mail.gmail.com>
	 <6291fc850705160117v284b69bbo56f0b5bc6a5c564e@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain
Date: Wed, 16 May 2007 13:28:40 +0200
Message-Id: <1179314920.3824.20.camel@jfcpc>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

On Wed, 2007-05-16 at 10:17 +0200, Henri Gomez wrote:
> 2007/4/24, Henri Gomez <henri.gomez@gmail.com>:
> > 2007/4/24, Rainer Jung <rainer.jung@kippdata.de>:
> > > The flag is about the response body. We send the response back via a
> > > webserver specific method. It's ws_write() ind mod_jk.c.
> > >
> > > ws_write() calls e.g. ap_rwrite() which should in my opinion set
> > > sent_bodyct. I'm careful about that, because I don't fully understand
> > > the filter architecture involved.

The ap_http_header_filter sets the sent_bodyct.
If I get it right ap_http_header_filter is called by ap_pass_brigade
that is called by ap_rwrite in ws_write()

In 1.3 it is set in ap_send_http_header() that we call in mod_jk.c
(ws_start_response).

> > >
> > > But ws_write() also contains iSeries specific code. Maybe some of those
> > > methods fail. You can log p->r->sent_bodyct inside ws_write and also add
> > > some debug log to find out, if it stopps prematurely. Especially
> > > ap_change_response_body_xlate() does not seem to be part of standard
> > > apache code. No idea, if that has an interaction bug with filters.
> >
> > No more, we're is AS400_UTF8 mode so the ws_write in i5/OS and Linux
> > is the same...
> >
> 
> Did you heard about problem with sent_bodyct problem on others platform ?
> 
> BTW, what about the BZ 41563
> (http://marc.info/?l=tomcat-dev&m=117089564901077&w=2) and proposed
> patch ?

+1 to apply it.

Cheers

Jean-Frederic

> 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@tomcat.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@tomcat.apache.org
> 


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@tomcat.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@tomcat.apache.org