tomcat-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Rainer Jung <>
Subject Re: New branch ?
Date Fri, 18 May 2007 17:40:42 GMT

I think Yoav might have misunderstood your suggestion. I interprete the 
branch you posted as the one, you suggest to use for the maintenance of 
the existing 6.0.x source and to use trunk to proceed with working on 
annotations, comet etc.

What I would find a little strange, would be using

as the trunk and working on there. Unfortunately svn does neither 
have tags nor branches, so we are free to produce very complicated 
constructions if we like :)

My impression is, that

in fact is a branch, namely the 6.0 development branch and should 
contain all 6.0 development. The mainstream parts in

(it's actually the head of 6.0), the more experimental parts, which are 
still planned for first release in 6.0 and not in would be 
developped in

So development which is targeted against in my opinion should go 

(which means we would have several paths with the word trunk in them) or 
we reorganize (puuh) by moving


and delete the then empty

Of course this will break a lot and at the end we will most likely use a 
construction close to what we have now, but this layout seems to be the 
most traditional.



Remy Maucherat wrote:
> Yoav Shapira wrote:
>> Hola,
>> On 5/18/07, Remy Maucherat <> wrote:
>>> http(s):// ?
>> Or 
>> http(s):// 
> If it gets that experimental, it should go to the sandbox instead. 
> Overall, I don't like a branch named against a random feature.
> If development remains in trunk, then the version number or eventual 
> release is not implied by anything.
> Rémy

To unsubscribe, e-mail:
For additional commands, e-mail:

View raw message