Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-tomcat-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 31817 invoked from network); 19 Apr 2007 12:46:32 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.2) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 19 Apr 2007 12:46:32 -0000 Received: (qmail 55995 invoked by uid 500); 19 Apr 2007 12:46:35 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-tomcat-dev-archive@tomcat.apache.org Received: (qmail 55704 invoked by uid 500); 19 Apr 2007 12:46:34 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@tomcat.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: "Tomcat Developers List" Delivered-To: mailing list dev@tomcat.apache.org Received: (qmail 55692 invoked by uid 99); 19 Apr 2007 12:46:34 -0000 Received: from herse.apache.org (HELO herse.apache.org) (140.211.11.133) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 19 Apr 2007 05:46:34 -0700 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0 tests=SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (herse.apache.org: domain of henri.gomez@gmail.com designates 64.233.184.228 as permitted sender) Received: from [64.233.184.228] (HELO wr-out-0506.google.com) (64.233.184.228) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 19 Apr 2007 05:46:27 -0700 Received: by wr-out-0506.google.com with SMTP id q50so571935wrq for ; Thu, 19 Apr 2007 05:46:06 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=NQVRWuF8ndgR/FUOqAtX+Cb5dUBU8dTY3NgIauR/5B61xKNwdVm6ufT7neLTufQ6Tkwwt7Kzwb9bjs/KEfz02vsTfQJ2h6fxd/zac0FdDffQHyGFYs1tRkhNZEedupIp5dbEPsOurX9FPV33wWGVG+uvo4Xp10jJa7m7NKrQEKM= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=gP8bA0bjWOmqgGbJ+Zi1FWLFTbP0qaK6d9wMDQqwBGdf2IJ/QITfQ+t4mKf2ixNAbQWLZQ0Wy0ZYRZuxmEWw59EsoVleV10D1oWw8q3nIRyFRUG5ZWstKhL5la9Kb0jmO53GqM4DkqhBL+tLP0lo2oXcAiR6D5rOWyEG/tG0134= Received: by 10.115.88.1 with SMTP id q1mr708249wal.1176986765540; Thu, 19 Apr 2007 05:46:05 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.115.72.15 with HTTP; Thu, 19 Apr 2007 05:46:05 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <6291fc850704190546g26eb9cd5t3de35a4ed6786f8a@mail.gmail.com> Date: Thu, 19 Apr 2007 14:46:05 +0200 From: "Henri Gomez" To: "Tomcat Developers List" Subject: Re: snprintf/vsnprintf in mod_jk In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <6291fc850704140932m9ca157brcafd6b9f749a2586@mail.gmail.com> <6291fc850704160852t7fe58fafx5209ae5e4723dbdc@mail.gmail.com> X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org yes, very interesting, it could explain why there is core under i5/OS, this platform is very sensible when memory leak or buffer overflow happens... 2007/4/19, Guenter Knauf : > Hi, > > Well the latest mod_jk working on i5/OS v5R3 was 1.2.19. 1.2.20, > > 1.2.21 and 1.2.22 didn't works and you could see on the dev list the > > various problems encoutered. > hmm, interesting....; > I did just apply my recent sp_snprintf() hack to 1.1.19 and 1.2.20 so that I could now compile it for Apache 1.3.x, and while 1.1.19 loads/unloads fine, with 1.2.20 I see the memory leak of 8280 bytes introduced; that was just a quick test to make sure I didnt introduce it with linking the compiler runtime. > So there was definitely a memory leak introduced between 1.2.19 and 1.2.20, and its still present in trunk... > > Guenter. > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@tomcat.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@tomcat.apache.org > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@tomcat.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@tomcat.apache.org