Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-tomcat-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 57856 invoked from network); 13 Apr 2007 09:45:05 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.2) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 13 Apr 2007 09:45:05 -0000 Received: (qmail 32452 invoked by uid 500); 13 Apr 2007 09:45:07 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-tomcat-dev-archive@tomcat.apache.org Received: (qmail 32397 invoked by uid 500); 13 Apr 2007 09:45:07 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@tomcat.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: "Tomcat Developers List" Delivered-To: mailing list dev@tomcat.apache.org Received: (qmail 32386 invoked by uid 99); 13 Apr 2007 09:45:07 -0000 Received: from herse.apache.org (HELO herse.apache.org) (140.211.11.133) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 13 Apr 2007 02:45:07 -0700 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=10.0 tests= X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (herse.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [64.202.165.238] (HELO smtpout10.prod.mesa1.secureserver.net) (64.202.165.238) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with SMTP; Fri, 13 Apr 2007 02:44:59 -0700 Received: (qmail 29458 invoked from network); 13 Apr 2007 09:44:38 -0000 Received: from unknown (24.15.193.17) by smtpout10-04.prod.mesa1.secureserver.net (64.202.165.238) with ESMTP; 13 Apr 2007 09:44:38 -0000 Message-ID: <461F5106.9080807@rowe-clan.net> Date: Fri, 13 Apr 2007 04:44:38 -0500 From: "William A. Rowe, Jr." User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.10 (X11/20070302) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Tomcat Developers List Subject: Re: [VOTE] Releasing Tomcat Connectors 1.2.22 References: <461F2434.5040804@apache.org> <461F395C.5030906@rowe-clan.net> <461F4D65.4010003@apache.org> In-Reply-To: <461F4D65.4010003@apache.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Mladen Turk wrote: > > Don't understand your question. > It was more then a week available for a developers review. > The official stable is still 1.2.21 until 1.2.22 gets votes or not, > in which case we'll go for 1.2.23. > So what's the problem? How many times will I repeat to this list that until something has three affirmative votes from PMC members and more affirmative than negative votes, it is not a release from the ASF. And (this might be new to you) anything on www.apache.org/dist/ is official. This primarily protects you - it's your ass (your tarball) until the foundation adopts YOUR tarball as the ASF's release. Ratifying your tarball makes it no longer yours. So any legal fallout was just owned by the ASF. If you want be an RM, or at least play one at an ASF project, let the ASF cover your ass and wait for a vote before hanging yourself out to dry. Look, if it comes up again, I simply won't post here. I'll just point to the archives of the previous warnings/instructions and ask Infra to turn off some group bits as appropriate. The very few, very specific rules were spelled out on THIS dev list at least three times in twelve months. What's the disconnect? Bill --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@tomcat.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@tomcat.apache.org