Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-tomcat-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 65810 invoked from network); 23 Feb 2007 03:02:32 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.2) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 23 Feb 2007 03:02:32 -0000 Received: (qmail 59682 invoked by uid 500); 23 Feb 2007 03:02:36 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-tomcat-dev-archive@tomcat.apache.org Received: (qmail 59636 invoked by uid 500); 23 Feb 2007 03:02:36 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@tomcat.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: "Tomcat Developers List" Delivered-To: mailing list dev@tomcat.apache.org Received: (qmail 59625 invoked by uid 99); 23 Feb 2007 03:02:36 -0000 Received: from herse.apache.org (HELO herse.apache.org) (140.211.11.133) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 22 Feb 2007 19:02:36 -0800 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=10.0 tests= X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (herse.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [206.18.177.55] (HELO alnrmhc15.comcast.net) (206.18.177.55) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 22 Feb 2007 19:02:24 -0800 Received: from [192.168.0.100] (c-68-34-3-4.hsd1.md.comcast.net[68.34.3.4]) by comcast.net (alnrmhc15) with ESMTP id <20070223030203b1500k6ss8e>; Fri, 23 Feb 2007 03:02:03 +0000 Message-ID: <45DE592C.2010000@apache.org> Date: Thu, 22 Feb 2007 22:02:04 -0500 From: Mark Thomas User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.9 (Windows/20061207) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Tomcat Developers List Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release build 6.0.10 References: <45D5BE67.4050806@apache.org> <45DD8F1D.6090704@apache.org> In-Reply-To: <45DD8F1D.6090704@apache.org> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.94.1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Remy Maucherat wrote: >> According to the (slightly) updated release process, the 6.0.10 tag is: >> [ ] Broken >> [ ] Alpha >> [ ] Beta >> [X] Stable > > So far, there are 3 binding votes for stable (with one from an inactive > committer), and 1 for beta. While a beta or stable release could legaly > be made, I don't feel comfortable with it without more votes. In my usage to date I haven't found any issues that prevent it being stable. Mark --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@tomcat.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@tomcat.apache.org