Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-tomcat-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 35365 invoked from network); 20 Nov 2006 23:56:32 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.2) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 20 Nov 2006 23:56:32 -0000 Received: (qmail 87546 invoked by uid 500); 20 Nov 2006 23:56:35 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-tomcat-dev-archive@tomcat.apache.org Received: (qmail 87491 invoked by uid 500); 20 Nov 2006 23:56:35 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@tomcat.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: "Tomcat Developers List" Delivered-To: mailing list dev@tomcat.apache.org Received: (qmail 87464 invoked by uid 99); 20 Nov 2006 23:56:35 -0000 Received: from herse.apache.org (HELO herse.apache.org) (140.211.11.133) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 20 Nov 2006 15:56:35 -0800 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0 tests=SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (herse.apache.org: domain of henri.gomez@gmail.com designates 64.233.182.186 as permitted sender) Received: from [64.233.182.186] (HELO nf-out-0910.google.com) (64.233.182.186) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 20 Nov 2006 15:56:23 -0800 Received: by nf-out-0910.google.com with SMTP id p46so2684153nfa for ; Mon, 20 Nov 2006 15:56:02 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=ubOVSdWGvBAbRJ46aKmKDl1NsW1+ecAdD1RdWAGZMc8IJlSe44hrwrlNACWVOGVAVhlUYQyySk+mRUngKYnJKVImUPbfaiZhq6gd61IqAMtjpj3ONFkPMhDL7Auac2WnP1G/HoO8o7L6jQ+0VoSfbOqxOdAQs69BnQmbTghxLDA= Received: by 10.49.91.6 with SMTP id t6mr116260nfl.1164066962434; Mon, 20 Nov 2006 15:56:02 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.49.87.1 with HTTP; Mon, 20 Nov 2006 15:56:02 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <6291fc850611201556s6ea1b4e8j457d2a2d9db21f80@mail.gmail.com> Date: Tue, 21 Nov 2006 00:56:02 +0100 From: "Henri Gomez" To: "Tomcat Developers List" Subject: Re: [Proposal] Change in behaviour of uriworkermap.properties In-Reply-To: <456232E2.8070708@kippdata.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <45622A27.203@kippdata.de> <6291fc850611201435g13eed76k3377b3383268335f@mail.gmail.com> <456232E2.8070708@kippdata.de> X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org > Yeah, that would also be very nice. But: mounts are handled per virtual > server, so if you wanted to change a mount for a special virtual server, > you would also need to call the admin webapp inside that virtual server. > Many deployments I know, place the admin webapp (=status worker) in a > special virtual host, only listening on an admin network. That one will > not see the mounts of the other virtual hosts. I'm thinking about how we > can improve the interoperability between the status worker, shared > memory and the mount maps, but that will be a more tricky change. A mount is a mount, and if you use it in a virtual server, it's up to you. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@tomcat.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@tomcat.apache.org