From dev-return-76233-apmail-tomcat-dev-archive=tomcat.apache.org@tomcat.apache.org Sun Nov 12 21:03:48 2006 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-tomcat-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 17953 invoked from network); 12 Nov 2006 21:03:46 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.2) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 12 Nov 2006 21:03:46 -0000 Received: (qmail 77366 invoked by uid 500); 12 Nov 2006 21:03:50 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-tomcat-dev-archive@tomcat.apache.org Received: (qmail 77308 invoked by uid 500); 12 Nov 2006 21:03:50 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@tomcat.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: "Tomcat Developers List" Delivered-To: mailing list dev@tomcat.apache.org Received: (qmail 77295 invoked by uid 99); 12 Nov 2006 21:03:50 -0000 Received: from herse.apache.org (HELO herse.apache.org) (140.211.11.133) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 12 Nov 2006 13:03:50 -0800 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0 tests=SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (herse.apache.org: domain of jak-tomcat-dev@m.gmane.org designates 80.91.229.2 as permitted sender) Received: from [80.91.229.2] (HELO ciao.gmane.org) (80.91.229.2) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 12 Nov 2006 13:03:35 -0800 Received: from list by ciao.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.43) id 1GjMTs-0005Sn-04 for dev@tomcat.apache.org; Sun, 12 Nov 2006 22:03:08 +0100 Received: from dslb-084-061-150-218.pools.arcor-ip.net ([84.61.150.218]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Sun, 12 Nov 2006 22:03:07 +0100 Received: from skoehler by dslb-084-061-150-218.pools.arcor-ip.net with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Sun, 12 Nov 2006 22:03:07 +0100 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: dev@tomcat.apache.org From: =?ISO-8859-15?Q?Sven_K=F6hler?= Subject: Re: AJP flush packets? Date: Sun, 12 Nov 2006 22:02:53 +0100 Lines: 43 Message-ID: References: <4556D30C.4040405@apache.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="------------enig0257F6306D632ACD3190826E" X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: dslb-084-061-150-218.pools.arcor-ip.net User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.8 (Windows/20061025) In-Reply-To: <4556D30C.4040405@apache.org> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.94.1.1 Sender: news X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --------------enig0257F6306D632ACD3190826E Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable >> i see, you're developing Tomcat 6.0. >> >> Will Tomcat 6.0 send flush packets, when the flush()-method of the >> OutputStreams or the Writers are called? >=20 > Yes. It's done in a way that is backward compatible. > When out.flush() is called an empty data packet is sent. Did it really need to be done like that? :-( Well, not matter how, but it was done, so it's a reason to be happy :-) >> It's something really needed by mod_proxy_ajp, mod_jk, and so on to >> property transport flushes to. >=20 > The implementation is in the SVN both for mod_jk > and mod_proxy_ajp. You will have to wait for the > next release (mod_jk 1.2.20) if you don't wish to > use the SVN builds. Thanks for the hints! So i will wait for mod_jk 1.2.20. --------------enig0257F6306D632ACD3190826E Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (Cygwin) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFFV4v97Ww7FjRBE4ARArjyAJ43pDiT4Np80aMj7PtU5aq256UwsgCeJY2S fXqM/nhwdVasfKIW9dnHxY8= =q2KW -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --------------enig0257F6306D632ACD3190826E--