tomcat-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Henri Gomez" <henri.go...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: [Proposal] Change in behaviour of uriworkermap.properties
Date Mon, 20 Nov 2006 23:56:02 GMT
> Yeah, that would also be very nice. But: mounts are handled per virtual
> server, so if you wanted to change a mount for a special virtual server,
> you would also need to call the admin webapp inside that virtual server.
> Many deployments I know, place the admin webapp (=status worker) in a
> special virtual host, only listening on an admin network. That one will
> not see the mounts of the other virtual hosts. I'm thinking about how we
> can improve the interoperability between the status worker, shared
> memory and the mount maps, but that will be a more tricky change.

A mount is a mount, and if you use it in a virtual server, it's up to you.

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@tomcat.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@tomcat.apache.org


Mime
View raw message