tomcat-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Mladen Turk <mt...@apache.org>
Subject Re: State of affairs for mod_jk 1.2.20
Date Fri, 24 Nov 2006 14:00:42 GMT
Rainer Jung wrote:
> For those who want to test: I committed far the most part of what I 
> planned to improve.

Thanks Rainer, the patches you made are really great!
I think we'll have a best ever mod_jk.

However I still have doubts about you patch:

 > @@ -1219,8 +1219,8 @@
 >              jk_log(l, JK_LOG_INFO,
 >                     "(%s) all endpoints are disconnected or dead",
 >                     ae->worker->name);
 > -            JK_TRACE_EXIT(l);
 > -            return JK_FALSE;
 > +            jk_log(l, JK_LOG_INFO,
 > +                   "Increase the backend idle connection timeout or the connection_pool_minsize");

The patch you made is IMHO dubious.
I agree it works for standard sittuations when backend
Tomcat closes the connection, but it fails when the backend
is dead or (the major problem) when the firewall closes the
connection between them.
With your patch we loose the option to have a session-free
nodes. There is simply no chance to have a lb that will
go to another node if the existing one fails.

Regards,
Mladen.


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@tomcat.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@tomcat.apache.org


Mime
View raw message