Return-Path: 
 <dev-return-74779-apmail-tomcat-dev-archive=tomcat.apache.org@tomcat.apache.org>
Delivered-To: apmail-tomcat-dev-archive@www.apache.org
Received: (qmail 17031 invoked from network); 16 Sep 2006 23:19:54 -0000
Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (209.237.227.199)
  by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 16 Sep 2006 23:19:54 -0000
Received: (qmail 11392 invoked by uid 500); 16 Sep 2006 23:19:50 -0000
Delivered-To: apmail-tomcat-dev-archive@tomcat.apache.org
Received: (qmail 11349 invoked by uid 500); 16 Sep 2006 23:19:49 -0000
Mailing-List: contact dev-help@tomcat.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:dev-help@tomcat.apache.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:dev-unsubscribe@tomcat.apache.org>
List-Post: <mailto:dev@tomcat.apache.org>
List-Id: <dev.tomcat.apache.org>
Reply-To: "Tomcat Developers List" <dev@tomcat.apache.org>
Delivered-To: mailing list dev@tomcat.apache.org
Received: (qmail 11338 invoked by uid 500); 16 Sep 2006 23:19:49 -0000
Delivered-To: apmail-jakarta-tomcat-dev@jakarta.apache.org
Received: (qmail 11335 invoked by uid 99); 16 Sep 2006 23:19:49 -0000
Received: from asf.osuosl.org (HELO asf.osuosl.org) (140.211.166.49)
    by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 16 Sep 2006 16:19:49 -0700
X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-9.4 required=10.0
	tests=ALL_TRUSTED,NO_REAL_NAME
X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org
Received: from [209.237.227.198] (HELO brutus.apache.org) (209.237.227.198)
    by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 16 Sep 2006 16:19:48 -0700
Received: by brutus.apache.org (Postfix, from userid 33)
	id 29919714315; Sat, 16 Sep 2006 23:16:00 +0000 (GMT)
From: bugzilla@apache.org
To: tomcat-dev@jakarta.apache.org
Subject: DO NOT REPLY [Bug 39966]  - Class Cast Exception inTagHandlerPool
In-Reply-To: <bug-39966-78@http.issues.apache.org/bugzilla/>
X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo
Message-Id: <20060916231600.29919714315@brutus.apache.org>
Date: Sat, 16 Sep 2006 23:16:00 +0000 (GMT)
X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org
X-Spam-Rating: minotaur.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG�
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
<http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39966>.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND�
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39966





------- Additional Comments From scott@indosoft.ca  2006-09-16 23:15 -------
(In reply to comment #2)
> I filed this bug a while ago and have since changed jobs so I cannot reproduce
> it. However from what I recall I was using <jspversion>2.0</jspversion>. 
> It is unclear from your comment but are you trying to say that TagHandlerPool is
> only used for older versions of JSP? 

Nope, just saying I had the exact same problem.  As far as I can tell,
TagHandlerPool is still used, but the overall handling of tags is slightly
different in 2.0 (interface JspTag was shunted to be a superinterface of Tag). 
So I think if you specify <2.0 in the TLD, the translator will go ahead and
expect the Tag interface in your custom tags.  It'll use TagAdapter to link them
both together (so getParent() works properly when you mix and match
SimpleTag[Support] subclasses with implementors of Tag).

-- 
Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@tomcat.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@tomcat.apache.org