Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-tomcat-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 36322 invoked from network); 9 Jun 2006 19:40:39 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (209.237.227.199) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 9 Jun 2006 19:40:39 -0000 Received: (qmail 57206 invoked by uid 500); 9 Jun 2006 19:40:35 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-tomcat-dev-archive@tomcat.apache.org Received: (qmail 56846 invoked by uid 500); 9 Jun 2006 19:40:34 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@tomcat.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: "Tomcat Developers List" Delivered-To: mailing list dev@tomcat.apache.org Received: (qmail 56835 invoked by uid 99); 9 Jun 2006 19:40:34 -0000 Received: from asf.osuosl.org (HELO asf.osuosl.org) (140.211.166.49) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 09 Jun 2006 12:40:34 -0700 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.3 required=10.0 tests=RCVD_NUMERIC_HELO,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (asf.osuosl.org: domain of jak-tomcat-dev@m.gmane.org designates 80.91.229.2 as permitted sender) Received: from [80.91.229.2] (HELO ciao.gmane.org) (80.91.229.2) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 09 Jun 2006 12:40:32 -0700 Received: from list by ciao.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.43) id 1Fomq3-0002Cu-BM for dev@tomcat.apache.org; Fri, 09 Jun 2006 21:40:11 +0200 Received: from 64.171.57.66 ([64.171.57.66]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Fri, 09 Jun 2006 21:40:11 +0200 Received: from shankarunni by 64.171.57.66 with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Fri, 09 Jun 2006 21:40:11 +0200 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: dev@tomcat.apache.org From: Shankar Unni Subject: Re: Conflicts and JDT Date: Fri, 09 Jun 2006 12:39:56 -0700 Lines: 35 Message-ID: References: <44884549.50704@apache.org> <96e4b5230606080856r7adf0d9dia5e0ccf6d2292734@mail.gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: 64.171.57.66 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.8.0.4) Gecko/20060516 Thunderbird/1.5.0.4 Mnenhy/0.7.3.0 In-Reply-To: Sender: news X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org X-Spam-Rating: minotaur.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N Yoav Shapira wrote: > There's also another reason: if we use JDT then we don't require users > to have the complete JDK, only a JRE. This is a big deal (perhaps > even more important than the technical / performance benefits) from a > licensing perspective, especially for people who repackage / > redistribute Tomcat as part of their products. The Sun JDK license terms explicitly state that "tools.jar" is redistributable along with the JRE. So technically, that shouldn't be a reason for including the JDT. On the other hand, I can see (a) convenience (using unmodified JRE distributions with Tomcat), (b) performance (JDT's compiler is supposedly faster), etc., as good reasons for including it. From java/jre/README.txt: ... Redistribution of Java2 SDK Files. The limited set of files from the SDK listed below may be included in vendor redistributions of the Java 2 Runtime Environment. All paths are relative to the top-level directory of the SDK. ... - The javac bytecode compiler, consisting of the following files: bin/javac [Solaris(TM) Operating Environment and Linux] bin/sparcv9/javac [Solaris Operating Environment (SPARC(TM) Platform Edition)] bin/javac.exe [Microsoft Windows] lib/tools.jar [All platforms] ... --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@tomcat.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@tomcat.apache.org