Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-tomcat-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 88948 invoked from network); 22 Jun 2006 16:39:22 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (209.237.227.199) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 22 Jun 2006 16:39:22 -0000 Received: (qmail 23625 invoked by uid 500); 22 Jun 2006 16:39:17 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-tomcat-dev-archive@tomcat.apache.org Received: (qmail 23602 invoked by uid 500); 22 Jun 2006 16:39:17 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@tomcat.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: "Tomcat Developers List" Delivered-To: mailing list dev@tomcat.apache.org Received: (qmail 23591 invoked by uid 99); 22 Jun 2006 16:39:17 -0000 Received: from asf.osuosl.org (HELO asf.osuosl.org) (140.211.166.49) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 22 Jun 2006 09:39:17 -0700 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=10.0 tests= X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (asf.osuosl.org: local policy) Received: from [212.27.42.27] (HELO smtp1-g19.free.fr) (212.27.42.27) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 22 Jun 2006 09:39:16 -0700 Received: from [192.168.0.1] (gou06-1-82-224-99-120.fbx.proxad.net [82.224.99.120]) by smtp1-g19.free.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id AB8079AEC9 for ; Thu, 22 Jun 2006 18:38:55 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <449AC79E.1060107@apache.org> Date: Thu, 22 Jun 2006 18:38:54 +0200 From: Remy Maucherat User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.4 (Windows/20060516) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Tomcat Developers List Subject: Re: NIO Connector, please review References: <4496A724.5060107@hanik.com> <200606191733.k5JHXMH7006237@harpy.wilshire.com> <35657.148.107.10.20.1150752071.squirrel@www.hanik.com> <58419.148.107.10.20.1150755091.squirrel@www.hanik.com> <4499ED66.7060705@hanik.com> <449A5472.6000106@apache.org> <449AA824.3080407@hanik.com> <449AB110.4070906@apache.org> <449AB72D.5060006@hanik.com> <449ABB64.5060504@apache.org> <449ABFC2.4040300@hanik.com> <449AC277.8060305@hanik.com> <449AC408.5040800@apache.org> <449AC497.9080304@hanik.com> In-Reply-To: <449AC497.9080304@hanik.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org X-Spam-Rating: minotaur.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N Filip Hanik - Dev Lists wrote: > Remy Maucherat wrote: >> Filip Hanik - Dev Lists wrote: >>> Alright, fixed, my last night checkin, the one I was unable to diff, >>> caused the problem, I have reverted that one, and the Connector since >>> we can use the fully qualified classname here. >> >> I am able to diff to see what got fixed, and it's trivial: all >> requests were processed as Comet events. > yup, noticed that when I ran it in a debugger, I wanted to consolidate > the two processSocket method into one, i did it wrong. I can confirm it now works. The two methods are fundamentally different, and one of them was actually named processSocketEvent until I changed it back to processSocket. However, the throughput is very bad at the moment (/usr/sbin/ab.exe -n 20000 -c 10 -k http://127.0.0.1:8081/tomcat.gif): 800 req/s (with keepalive actually working) vs 6000+ for regular java.io. R�my --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@tomcat.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@tomcat.apache.org