Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-tomcat-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 5497 invoked from network); 24 May 2006 14:32:51 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (209.237.227.199) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 24 May 2006 14:32:51 -0000 Received: (qmail 10340 invoked by uid 500); 24 May 2006 14:32:46 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-tomcat-dev-archive@tomcat.apache.org Received: (qmail 10146 invoked by uid 500); 24 May 2006 14:32:46 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@tomcat.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: "Tomcat Developers List" Delivered-To: mailing list dev@tomcat.apache.org Received: (qmail 10135 invoked by uid 99); 24 May 2006 14:32:46 -0000 Received: from asf.osuosl.org (HELO asf.osuosl.org) (140.211.166.49) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 24 May 2006 07:32:46 -0700 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=10.0 tests= X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (asf.osuosl.org: local policy) Received: from [217.160.178.142] (HELO p15122102.pureserver.info) (217.160.178.142) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 24 May 2006 07:32:41 -0700 Received: from [192.168.1.3] (dslb-084-060-124-058.pools.arcor-ip.net [84.60.124.58]) by p15122102.pureserver.info (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0C0863AC225 for ; Wed, 24 May 2006 16:42:21 +0200 (CEST) Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v750) In-Reply-To: <44746B37.2010200@apache.org> References: <447459E8.3040403@unil.ch> <44746355.1000600@unil.ch> <44746B37.2010200@apache.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; delsp=yes; format=flowed Message-Id: <7FD36144-8307-41B2-8E94-63092B54348D@objektpark.de> Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable From: Peter Rossbach Subject: Re: URLStreamHandler and ContentHandler Date: Wed, 24 May 2006 16:32:17 +0200 To: "Tomcat Developers List" X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.750) X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org X-Spam-Rating: minotaur.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N Am 24.05.2006 um 16:18 schrieb Remy Maucherat: > Yoav Shapira wrote: >> Hola, >>> > Mmm, I'd hate having endorsed classes depend on commons-logging ;( >>> >>> Could you expand this thought? >> It's a simple thought, like I said, shooting from the hip. >> Commons-Logging has an unfortunate history >> (http://www.qos.ch/logging/thinkAgain.jsp), and the deeper / =20 >> higher it >> is on the classpath, the worse the potential. It doesn't get much >> deeper on the classpath than the endorsed repository, so putting >> commons-logging there made me instinctively cringe a bit. > > This article is total FUD, this should be obvious. Actually, log4j =20 > is one of the libraries which has been causing the most problems in =20= > Tomcat (the most being held by Xerces, which thankfully is now =20 > solved). > > If you want to say bye bye to logging problem, it's easy: we need =20 > to switch Tomcat to java.util.logging (with an appropriate =20 > LogManager and Handlers, of course). > +1 of that... > R=E9my > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@tomcat.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@tomcat.apache.org > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@tomcat.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@tomcat.apache.org