Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-tomcat-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 90405 invoked from network); 24 May 2006 13:45:22 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (209.237.227.199) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 24 May 2006 13:45:22 -0000 Received: (qmail 9904 invoked by uid 500); 24 May 2006 13:45:16 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-tomcat-dev-archive@tomcat.apache.org Received: (qmail 9847 invoked by uid 500); 24 May 2006 13:45:16 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@tomcat.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: "Tomcat Developers List" Delivered-To: mailing list dev@tomcat.apache.org Received: (qmail 9803 invoked by uid 99); 24 May 2006 13:45:16 -0000 Received: from asf.osuosl.org (HELO asf.osuosl.org) (140.211.166.49) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 24 May 2006 06:45:16 -0700 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0 tests=SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (asf.osuosl.org: domain of Javier.Iglesias@unil.ch designates 130.223.8.20 as permitted sender) Received: from [130.223.8.20] (HELO uldns1.unil.ch) (130.223.8.20) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 24 May 2006 06:45:14 -0700 Received: from iislap02.unil.ch ([130.223.70.102]) by uldns1.unil.ch with esmtpa (Exim 4.44) id 1FitfR-0003tJ-7A for dev@tomcat.apache.org; Wed, 24 May 2006 15:44:53 +0200 Message-ID: <44746355.1000600@unil.ch> Date: Wed, 24 May 2006 15:44:53 +0200 From: Javier Iglesias User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.2 (Macintosh/20060308) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Tomcat Developers List Subject: Re: URLStreamHandler and ContentHandler References: <447459E8.3040403@unil.ch> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org X-Spam-Rating: minotaur.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N Hi Yoav, > Mmm, I'd hate having endorsed classes depend on commons-logging ;( Could you expand this thought? > what happens if you don't depend on commons-logging? It's not going to be easy to instruct the JCS and JORAM communities to stop using commons-logging just because I wish so : ) I don't (yet) depend on commons-logging directly, even if I was considering this possibility in a short future... --j --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@tomcat.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@tomcat.apache.org