Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-tomcat-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 38999 invoked from network); 10 Apr 2006 08:46:50 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (209.237.227.199) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 10 Apr 2006 08:46:50 -0000 Received: (qmail 72894 invoked by uid 500); 10 Apr 2006 08:46:45 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-tomcat-dev-archive@tomcat.apache.org Received: (qmail 72841 invoked by uid 500); 10 Apr 2006 08:46:45 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@tomcat.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: "Tomcat Developers List" Delivered-To: mailing list dev@tomcat.apache.org Received: (qmail 72830 invoked by uid 99); 10 Apr 2006 08:46:45 -0000 Received: from asf.osuosl.org (HELO asf.osuosl.org) (140.211.166.49) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 10 Apr 2006 01:46:45 -0700 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0 tests=SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (asf.osuosl.org: domain of jak-tomcat-dev@m.gmane.org designates 80.91.229.2 as permitted sender) Received: from [80.91.229.2] (HELO ciao.gmane.org) (80.91.229.2) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 10 Apr 2006 01:46:44 -0700 Received: from list by ciao.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.43) id 1FSs2N-0001iw-Vq for dev@tomcat.apache.org; Mon, 10 Apr 2006 10:46:19 +0200 Received: from pool-71-107-254-216.lsanca.dsl-w.verizon.net ([71.107.254.216]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Mon, 10 Apr 2006 10:46:19 +0200 Received: from wbarker by pool-71-107-254-216.lsanca.dsl-w.verizon.net with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Mon, 10 Apr 2006 10:46:19 +0200 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: dev@tomcat.apache.org From: "Bill Barker" Subject: Re: svn commit: r392872 - /tomcat/tc6.0.x/trunk/build.xml Date: Mon, 10 Apr 2006 01:46:24 -0700 Lines: 31 Message-ID: References: <20060410013621.77756.qmail@minotaur.apache.org> <443A13C4.30106@apache.org> X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: pool-71-107-254-216.lsanca.dsl-w.verizon.net X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.2180 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.2180 X-RFC2646: Format=Flowed; Response Sender: news X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org X-Spam-Rating: minotaur.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N "Remy Maucherat" wrote in message news:443A13C4.30106@apache.org... > billbarker@apache.org wrote: >> Author: billbarker >> Date: Sun Apr 9 18:36:19 2006 >> New Revision: 392872 >> >> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?rev=392872&view=rev >> Log: >> Restore the ability to build with the Mail Resources > > Sorry, I am not going to accept these dependencies on proprietary code > anymore. I may add dummy API sources in the repository (that will not get > bundled, obviously), rewrite the classes using reflection, or remove > javamail support. Would these solutions work for you ? > My patch does nothing, unless you specify the jars specifically in the build.properties file. There was a good reason that I didn't patch build.properties.default as well. I'm +1 to use the Geronimo implementations of JavaMail, +0 to using the optional configuration that I just put in, -1 to removing any ability to build Tomcat without even optional JavaMail support. > I will add back the other JARs eventually, including DBCP and JDT. > > R�my --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@tomcat.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@tomcat.apache.org