Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-tomcat-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 99583 invoked from network); 10 Mar 2006 08:04:05 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (209.237.227.199) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 10 Mar 2006 08:04:05 -0000 Received: (qmail 49935 invoked by uid 500); 10 Mar 2006 08:03:58 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-tomcat-dev-archive@tomcat.apache.org Received: (qmail 49884 invoked by uid 500); 10 Mar 2006 08:03:58 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@tomcat.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: "Tomcat Developers List" Delivered-To: mailing list dev@tomcat.apache.org Received: (qmail 49873 invoked by uid 500); 10 Mar 2006 08:03:58 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-jakarta-tomcat-dev@jakarta.apache.org Received: (qmail 49870 invoked by uid 99); 10 Mar 2006 08:03:58 -0000 Received: from asf.osuosl.org (HELO asf.osuosl.org) (140.211.166.49) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 10 Mar 2006 00:03:58 -0800 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-9.4 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,NO_REAL_NAME X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [192.87.106.226] (HELO ajax.apache.org) (192.87.106.226) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 10 Mar 2006 00:03:57 -0800 Received: by ajax.apache.org (Postfix, from userid 65534) id 4151FD49FA; Fri, 10 Mar 2006 08:03:36 +0000 (GMT) From: bugzilla@apache.org To: tomcat-dev@jakarta.apache.org Subject: DO NOT REPLY [Bug 37356] - Tomcat does not invalidate sessions after session-timeout period has passed. In-Reply-To: X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo Message-Id: <20060310080336.4151FD49FA@ajax.apache.org> Date: Fri, 10 Mar 2006 08:03:36 +0000 (GMT) X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org X-Spam-Rating: minotaur.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG� RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND� INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37356 ------- Additional Comments From tm@allocation.net 2006-03-10 08:03 ------- (In reply to comment #19) > > I have a look at tomcat source code and it seems that the session validy > management is not always 'synchronized', so I agree with the "race condition > theory" ... > Yes, that were my thoughts as well, but the ++ and -- operations (as in sessionCount++) are atomic because sessionCount is an int. They should not need to be synchronized according to the virtual machine specifications. On another note: We also recently moved one perfectly well working installation to a new server, and suddntly we encounter this issue there as well. Previous installation: Single-Intel-CPU SuSE 9.0 Linux with kernel 2.6.11 Tomcat 5.0.29 - standalone jdk1.5.0_02 current installation: Dual AMD-x64 CPUs SuSE 9.3 (mostly out-of the box) with kernel 2.6.14 Tomcat 5.0.30 Apache httpd mod_jk jdk1.5.0_06 (x64) So the trigger has to be either the 64bit CPU / Java or Tomcat and mod_jk, or something in my configuration (the application is the same .war file) I do not have local access to any x64 machine, so I cannot debug that here, maybe someone else can jump in? -- Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@tomcat.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@tomcat.apache.org