Mailing-List: contact dev-help@tomcat.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: "Tomcat Developers List" <dev@tomcat.apache.org>
Received-SPF: pass (asf.osuosl.org: local policy)
Message-ID: <44045DB2.3030502@hookom.net>
Date: Tue, 28 Feb 2006 08:26:58 -0600
From: Jacob Hookom <jacob@hookom.net>
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 0.8 (Windows/20040913)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Tomcat Developers List <dev@tomcat.apache.org>
Subject: Re: New EL - Split Off from Tomcat 6
References: <4403B879.2070709@hookom.net> <440401DB.8070905@apache.org>
In-Reply-To: <440401DB.8070905@apache.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit

You can't compare a JSR spec to something like commons-logging, plus 
there are people requesting that it's separate for practical use.

Remy Maucherat wrote:

> Jacob Hookom wrote:
>
>> I would like to suggest splitting EL off as a separate library from 
>> Tomcat.  The EL-API is expected to rev in it's own specification in 
>> the future.  It is not have any dependencies on the Servlet API or 
>> JSP API and can be utilized in the same fashion as the commons-el 
>> project.
>
>
> The trend a little earlier was to have all the code for Tomcat 6 in 
> one repository, to make it easier to work with. There was no final 
> decision, but for sure I would like to not reproduce the 
> commons-logging situation (with a fully independent project).
>
> R�my
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@tomcat.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@tomcat.apache.org
>
>


-- 
Jacob Hookom  -  Minneapolis
----------------------------
JSF-EG, JSF-RI, EL, Facelets


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@tomcat.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@tomcat.apache.org