Return-Path: 
 <dev-return-66461-apmail-tomcat-dev-archive=tomcat.apache.org@tomcat.apache.org>
Delivered-To: apmail-tomcat-dev-archive@www.apache.org
Received: (qmail 42129 invoked from network); 22 Feb 2006 15:45:08 -0000
Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (209.237.227.199)
  by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 22 Feb 2006 15:45:08 -0000
Received: (qmail 37804 invoked by uid 500); 22 Feb 2006 15:45:01 -0000
Delivered-To: apmail-tomcat-dev-archive@tomcat.apache.org
Received: (qmail 37751 invoked by uid 500); 22 Feb 2006 15:45:00 -0000
Mailing-List: contact dev-help@tomcat.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:dev-help@tomcat.apache.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:dev-unsubscribe@tomcat.apache.org>
List-Post: <mailto:dev@tomcat.apache.org>
List-Id: <dev.tomcat.apache.org>
Reply-To: "Tomcat Developers List" <dev@tomcat.apache.org>
Delivered-To: mailing list dev@tomcat.apache.org
Received: (qmail 37738 invoked by uid 500); 22 Feb 2006 15:45:00 -0000
Delivered-To: apmail-jakarta-tomcat-dev@jakarta.apache.org
Received: (qmail 37735 invoked by uid 99); 22 Feb 2006 15:45:00 -0000
X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.6 required=10.0
	tests=NO_REAL_NAME
X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org
Received: from [192.87.106.226] (HELO ajax.apache.org) (192.87.106.226)
    by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 22 Feb 2006 07:45:00 -0800
Received: by ajax.apache.org (Postfix, from userid 99)
	id 4B52CDD; Wed, 22 Feb 2006 16:44:39 +0100 (CET)
From: bugzilla@apache.org
To: tomcat-dev@jakarta.apache.org
Subject: DO NOT REPLY [Bug 38740]  - (5.5.15) session attributes set in
 sessionCreated not synched
In-Reply-To: <bug-38740-78@http.issues.apache.org/bugzilla/>
X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo
Message-Id: <20060222154439.4B52CDD@ajax.apache.org>
Date: Wed, 22 Feb 2006 16:44:39 +0100 (CET)
X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org
X-Spam-Rating: minotaur.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG�
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
<http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38740>.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND�
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38740





------- Additional Comments From fhanik@apache.org  2006-02-22 16:44 -------
Believe me, I feel with you. But round robin on each request is not very
efficient, nor is the SimpleTcpReplicationManager.

You will get far more juice out of the DeltaManager. 

In order to have round robin, you should add the (waitForAck="true") to your
<Sender> element, this guarantees that the session is replicated before the
response is returned to the client. 

I BELIEVE THE WAITFORACK COULD SOLVE YOUR PROBLEM FOR TRUE ROUND ROBIN REPLICATION.

mod_jk has never been a big favorite of mine, I always use mod_proxy, and we
pair one apache with one tomcat, we always do the load balancing before we hit
apache.

The reason the bug is invalid, is cause its a simple documentation issue. If
your replication doesn't work due to the mod_jk implementation, then this bug is
still invalid, and you should open up one against that module. I have tested
your scenario and have found nothing wrong nor have I been able to reproduce the
error under any circumstances. 

I would say you received quite good support for all the $0 dollars you spent and
not reading the manual ;)

Let us know if we can help with anything else

-- 
Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@tomcat.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@tomcat.apache.org