Return-Path: 
 <dev-return-66265-apmail-tomcat-dev-archive=tomcat.apache.org@tomcat.apache.org>
Delivered-To: apmail-tomcat-dev-archive@www.apache.org
Received: (qmail 39265 invoked from network); 15 Feb 2006 16:16:04 -0000
Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (209.237.227.199)
  by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 15 Feb 2006 16:16:04 -0000
Received: (qmail 74038 invoked by uid 500); 15 Feb 2006 16:15:58 -0000
Delivered-To: apmail-tomcat-dev-archive@tomcat.apache.org
Received: (qmail 73994 invoked by uid 500); 15 Feb 2006 16:15:58 -0000
Mailing-List: contact dev-help@tomcat.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:dev-help@tomcat.apache.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:dev-unsubscribe@tomcat.apache.org>
List-Post: <mailto:dev@tomcat.apache.org>
List-Id: <dev.tomcat.apache.org>
Reply-To: "Tomcat Developers List" <dev@tomcat.apache.org>
Delivered-To: mailing list dev@tomcat.apache.org
Received: (qmail 73981 invoked by uid 99); 15 Feb 2006 16:15:58 -0000
Received: from asf.osuosl.org (HELO asf.osuosl.org) (140.211.166.49)
    by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 15 Feb 2006 08:15:58 -0800
X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=10.0
	tests=
X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org
Received-SPF: neutral (asf.osuosl.org: local policy)
Received: from [24.24.2.55] (HELO ms-smtp-01.nyroc.rr.com) (24.24.2.55)
    by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 15 Feb 2006 08:15:57 -0800
Received: from mail.lenio.net (cpe-66-67-219-192.rochester.res.rr.com
 [66.67.219.192])
	by ms-smtp-01.nyroc.rr.com (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id k1FGFYGj028527
	for <dev@tomcat.apache.org>; Wed, 15 Feb 2006 11:15:35 -0500 (EST)
Received: by mail.lenio.net (Postfix, from userid 500)
	id C5CA945D35B; Wed, 15 Feb 2006 11:15:34 -0500 (EST)
Date: Wed, 15 Feb 2006 11:15:34 -0500
From: Eric Lenio <eric@lenio.net>
To: Tomcat Developers List <dev@tomcat.apache.org>
Subject: Re: problem building 5.5.15
Message-ID: <20060215161534.GD29941@lenio.net>
References: <20060213154231.GC18794@lenio.net> <43F18684.4000907@apache.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <43F18684.4000907@apache.org>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.11
X-Virus-Scanned: Symantec AntiVirus Scan Engine
X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org
X-Spam-Rating: minotaur.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N

Well if the RM must generate this file for each release
perhaps then it could be added to subversion?

That way any time 'svn update' is used to refresh sources
the current Tomcat version can be known.

On Tue, Feb 14, 2006 at 08:28:04AM +0100, Mladen Turk wrote:
> 
> You will need to edit the build/build.properties.default
> and adjust the version numbers to preferred version.
> 
> It's up to RM to adjust them before releasing or building.
> We don't have actual version number inside the SVN, although
> we might add some sort of
> 
> <property file="version.current"/>
> in the build.xml that would contain only version flags:
> 
> # ----- Vesion Control Flags -----
> version.major=5
> version.minor=5
> version.build=1
> version.patch=16
> #Set the pretty version name
> version=5.5.16-dev
> 
> 
> Since that still implies that RM will still have to
> edit that file before releasing, you might as well create
> a build.properties file with the upper content.
> 
> The easiest thing would be to have a separate version
> property file updated regularly upon releases.
> 
> Regards,
> Mladen.
> 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@tomcat.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@tomcat.apache.org
> 

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@tomcat.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@tomcat.apache.org