tomcat-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From bugzi...@apache.org
Subject DO NOT REPLY [Bug 34107] - session already invalidated before valueUnbound() called
Date Thu, 02 Feb 2006 18:35:47 GMT
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
<http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34107>.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34107





------- Additional Comments From apernoud@sopragroup.com  2006-02-02 19:35 -------
(In reply to comment #13)
> (In reply to comment #12)
> > Well re-reading the spec, it finally seems that this the way the 2.4 
servlet 
> > is interpreted, but honestly I don't get the interest of it.
> Don't worry, I don't see it either.

That's fun, I've since found a lot of threads about it :
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36994
http://jira.opensymphony.com/browse/CACHE-229

Someone even told to complain to servletapi-feedback@eng.sun.com , and 
apparently "they" kept it in 2.4 and even in 2.5.

Do you think it may change anything to complain ? Cause I really agree with 
developers taking part of the discussion, this "simple" change will break a 
lot of framework, and I really really don't get the interest of the 
sessionListener anymore :))))))

-- 
Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@tomcat.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@tomcat.apache.org


Mime
View raw message