Mailing-List: contact dev-help@tomcat.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: "Tomcat Developers List" <dev@tomcat.apache.org>
Received-SPF: pass (asf.osuosl.org: local policy)
Date: Mon, 23 Jan 2006 16:43:26 -0800
From: Jan Luehe <Jan.Luehe@Sun.COM>
Subject: Re: [Fwd: Re: Response not flushed before RD.forward() returns]
In-reply-to: <dquo2f$1i6$1@sea.gmane.org>
To: Tomcat Developers List <dev@tomcat.apache.org>
Reply-to: Jan.Luehe@Sun.COM
Message-id: <43D5782E.8050003@sun.com>
MIME-version: 1.0
Content-type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-transfer-encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; SunOS sun4u; en-US; rv:1.4) Gecko/20041214
References: <43D0CD40.6040901@apache.org> <43D17F68.4000506@sun.com>
 <43D1E86C.4030807@apache.org> <dqss15$m2v$1@sea.gmane.org>
 <43D23B54.60606@apache.org> <dquo2f$1i6$1@sea.gmane.org>


Bill Barker wrote On 01/21/06 17:45,:
> "Remy Maucherat" <remm@apache.org> wrote in message=20
> news:43D23B54.60606@apache.org...
>=20
>>Bill Barker wrote:
>>
>>>Yeah, it's pretty much a fatal flaw in the Catalina design.  It's=
=20
>>>currently impossible for Catalina to satisfy both the requirements=
 for=20
>>>error-pages and forwards.
>>
>>Given the amount of people who have complained about this behavior =
which=20
>>has been present from the beginning of the Catalina architecture, "=
fatal"=20
>>is likely much too strong. However, I don't see any other way to do=
 this=20
>>stuff, and I also don't see it as being worth even attempting to fi=
x.
>>
>=20
>=20
> Yeah, "fatal" is probably too strong (of course, there are five or =
so years=20
> of record that I'm not a big fan of Catalina, so I probably oversta=
ted it=20
> :).
>=20
> To "fix" it (without changing the Catalina architecture) would prob=
ably=20
> require duplicating the StandardHostValve stuff in ApplicationFilte=
rChain=20
> (which would be just too horrible).  And, since as Jan has noted, t=
he spec=20
> is grey (or, rather, inconsistant) on this requirement,  I'm +1 to =
your -1=20
> ;-).
>=20
> Of course, if this gets clarified against us in the final 2.5 spec,=
 then=20
> we'll have to do it for Tomcat 6.

I've filed BZ 38361, so the discussion we're having is archived somew=
here.


Jan


>=20
>=20
>>R=E9my=20
>=20
>=20
>=20
>=20
>=20
> -------------------------------------------------------------------=
--
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@tomcat.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@tomcat.apache.org
>=20
>=20


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@tomcat.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@tomcat.apache.org