Mailing-List: contact dev-help@tomcat.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: "Tomcat Developers List" <dev@tomcat.apache.org>
Received-SPF: pass (asf.osuosl.org: domain of yoavshapira@gmail.com designates
 64.233.184.203 as permitted sender)
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws;
        s=beta; d=gmail.com;
        h=received:message-id:date:from:sender:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references;
        b=Zq5JaLgCNwT9VHJ9il8wUV+Mz5/ixhBgQWcUIXhmVZCKX3UlvhWtcExJErYzwd/F0oCP3rjJSpnbC5DYSbdH/sNOH96OnScmuQFc40tPVYUJYa2ewCvhrf3ZBNXYzB9YCknz6OyP0+poPLVumTX4wTPfeTNUaCGkMYuVV1xjJPA=
Message-ID: <db94f1a0512211054y19fc8fd9m905e2731f32d1490@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 21 Dec 2005 13:54:53 -0500
From: Yoav Shapira <yoavs@apache.org>
Sender: yoavshapira@gmail.com
To: Tomcat Developers List <dev@tomcat.apache.org>
Subject: Re: Tomcat 6 plans (JSP 2.1)
In-Reply-To: <96e4b5230512211051q59455350l1cd09d9ffe01d71f@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Disposition: inline
References: <43A86A32.1080300@apache.org> <43A8B30F.7090208@joedog.org>
	 <6291fc850512210100n11348113p@mail.gmail.com>
	 <dob6ek$v2l$1@sea.gmane.org>
	 <6291fc850512210122j264a211ex@mail.gmail.com>
	 <dob7tj$3l3$1@sea.gmane.org>
	 <6291fc850512210437s1c88aebr@mail.gmail.com>
	 <96e4b5230512211051q59455350l1cd09d9ffe01d71f@mail.gmail.com>

+1 to Costin's stuff... I've been itching for a truly minimal Tomcat
distro for a while...

Yoav

On 12/21/05, Costin Manolache <costin@gmail.com> wrote:
> I would really like to have something more modular too - I understand
> that NIO and the
> other connector stuff is unlikely to see the main branch, but I think
> 'minimal standalone + modules'  deserves a chance.
>
> Even if we continue to ship by default a bloated tomcat, with all the
> features anyone can think of or ever wanted - having those features
> organized like modules would make a lot of things easier and better.
>
> Almost all important platforms are designed this way - apache,  jboss,
> firefox, etc, it would be time for tomcat as well..
>
> By minimal standalone tomcat I mean: coyote http11 + servlet + jsp +
> minimal set of valves to have a TCK-accepted container. Modules =3D=3D
> jdbc authenticators, load balancing, ssl, jk, even APR, and anything
> that could be eventually released or upgraded independently.
>
> Costin
>
>
> On 12/21/05, Henri Gomez <henri.gomez@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > Sorry, so far nobody has had the sense to propose returning to the go=
od old
> > > TC 3.3 Interceptors ;-).  It looks like Evolution is here to stay.
> >
> > I don't know if Interceptors would be a good solutions but I'd really
> > like to have something similar to Apache modules.
> >
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@tomcat.apache.org
> > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@tomcat.apache.org
> >
> >
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@tomcat.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@tomcat.apache.org
>
>


--
Yoav Shapira
System Design and Management Fellow
MIT Sloan School of Management
Cambridge, MA, USA
yoavs@computer.org / www.yoavshapira.com

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@tomcat.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@tomcat.apache.org