Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-tomcat-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 52704 invoked from network); 20 Dec 2005 22:52:35 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (209.237.227.199) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 20 Dec 2005 22:52:35 -0000 Received: (qmail 95748 invoked by uid 500); 20 Dec 2005 22:52:28 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-tomcat-dev-archive@tomcat.apache.org Received: (qmail 95691 invoked by uid 500); 20 Dec 2005 22:52:28 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@tomcat.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: "Tomcat Developers List" Delivered-To: mailing list dev@tomcat.apache.org Received: (qmail 95679 invoked by uid 500); 20 Dec 2005 22:52:28 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-jakarta-tomcat-dev@jakarta.apache.org Received: (qmail 95667 invoked by uid 99); 20 Dec 2005 22:52:27 -0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.6 required=10.0 tests=NO_REAL_NAME X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [192.87.106.226] (HELO ajax.apache.org) (192.87.106.226) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 20 Dec 2005 14:52:27 -0800 Received: by ajax.apache.org (Postfix, from userid 99) id B4953CB; Tue, 20 Dec 2005 23:52:06 +0100 (CET) From: bugzilla@apache.org To: tomcat-dev@jakarta.apache.org Subject: DO NOT REPLY [Bug 29108] - "chunked" transfer-encoding is not working In-Reply-To: X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo Message-Id: <20051220225206.B4953CB@ajax.apache.org> Date: Tue, 20 Dec 2005 23:52:06 +0100 (CET) X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org X-Spam-Rating: minotaur.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG� RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND� INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29108 ------- Additional Comments From markt@apache.org 2005-12-20 23:52 ------- (In reply to comment #5) > This bug tracking system is the place to look into for getting the fixed release. No it isn't. The change log is the definitive source for matching bug fixes against releases. > Closed bugs must contain a fixed release comment or attribute. Whilst committers do endeavour to do this when they commit a fix, there is no policy within the Tomcat project that states that this must occur. > Not everyone has the knowledge to drill down hundred of files in CVS to look for > some unknown comment. Thanks you for your comprehension. It is not necessary to use the source repository (which, for the record, is now in SVN rather than CVS). Again, look at the change log. (Hint: look at the log for 5.0.x rather than 5.5.x as this bug was fixed quite some time ago). -- Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@tomcat.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@tomcat.apache.org