tomcat-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From bugzi...@apache.org
Subject DO NOT REPLY [Bug 37854] - Too strict Extension-List analysis
Date Wed, 21 Dec 2005 22:57:46 GMT
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
<http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37854>.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37854





------- Additional Comments From markt@apache.org  2005-12-21 23:57 -------
The attributes are optional for the plugin manifest but the same reference also
states:

"Note that all of the above manifest attributes should be included in an
optional package's manifest."

The key word here is "should". If it was "must", the current Tomcat behaviour
would be fine. Nothing states explicity what the desired behaviour is if the
optional package's manifest does not include one of the attributes.

Your interpretation is a sensible one but hinges on the assumption that "any
value" is the same as "no value". I want to think about this for a little while
before I make any changes. Watch this space...

-- 
Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@tomcat.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@tomcat.apache.org


Mime
View raw message