tomcat-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From bugzi...@apache.org
Subject DO NOT REPLY [Bug 37854] New: - Too strict Extension-List analysis
Date Fri, 09 Dec 2005 17:13:38 GMT
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
<http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37854>.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37854

           Summary: Too strict Extension-List analysis
           Product: Tomcat 4
           Version: 4.1.31
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: All
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: P2
         Component: Unknown
        AssignedTo: tomcat-dev@jakarta.apache.org
        ReportedBy: pgrange@cvf.fr


Using Extension-List in MANIFEST.MF jar files allows to specify dependencies  
between libraries or webapps.  
  
When a jar depends on an Extension without specifying an  
Implementation-Vendor-Id AND the corresponding extension does not specify an  
Implementation-Vendor-Id, tomcat fails loading the corresponding context  
claiming for a missing dependency.  
  
I thing that in this case (no Implementation-Vendor-Id in either files) the  
Implementation-Vendor-Id's must be considered OK and that it must not be  
enought to consider the dependency broken.

-- 
Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@tomcat.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@tomcat.apache.org


Mime
View raw message