Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-tomcat-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 28879 invoked from network); 28 Oct 2005 16:10:15 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (209.237.227.199) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 28 Oct 2005 16:10:15 -0000 Received: (qmail 94025 invoked by uid 500); 28 Oct 2005 16:10:07 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-tomcat-dev-archive@tomcat.apache.org Received: (qmail 93950 invoked by uid 500); 28 Oct 2005 16:10:06 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@tomcat.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: "Tomcat Developers List" Delivered-To: mailing list dev@tomcat.apache.org Received: (qmail 93939 invoked by uid 99); 28 Oct 2005 16:10:06 -0000 Received: from asf.osuosl.org (HELO asf.osuosl.org) (140.211.166.49) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 28 Oct 2005 09:10:06 -0700 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0 tests=SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (asf.osuosl.org: domain of costin@gmail.com designates 66.249.82.196 as permitted sender) Received: from [66.249.82.196] (HELO xproxy.gmail.com) (66.249.82.196) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 28 Oct 2005 09:10:03 -0700 Received: by xproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id s13so391213wxc for ; Fri, 28 Oct 2005 09:09:45 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=A3uEnbiPurLLwGQA8j1lFXUSivlrZ+zp2prNNbo5S5o3hsNgWMG2LzkjDwTMovJ3uRMpRnML4pswTqTkjDtP/sO5tOc65PJG/jYrghX5GdSIZuUbjYB7xI1+ljB6Z3QKDujbxqdzYAo3xd8kozOGpF6pgoE2gbIBbZ++6wTtzsg= Received: by 10.64.213.16 with SMTP id l16mr213918qbg; Fri, 28 Oct 2005 09:09:44 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.65.15.5 with HTTP; Fri, 28 Oct 2005 09:09:44 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <96e4b5230510280909p6bf6e64cpcbfd920f0037f1a@mail.gmail.com> Date: Fri, 28 Oct 2005 09:09:44 -0700 From: Costin Manolache Reply-To: costin@apache.org To: Tomcat Developers List Subject: Re: svn commit: r329053 - in /tomcat/sandbox/java: ./ org/ org/apache/ org/apache/commons/ org/apache/commons/logging/ In-Reply-To: <43621F85.6010000@apache.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline References: <20051028025511.12854.qmail@minotaur.apache.org> <43621F85.6010000@apache.org> X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org X-Spam-Rating: minotaur.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N On 10/28/05, Remy Maucherat wrote: > costin@apache.org wrote: > > Author: costin > > Date: Thu Oct 27 19:55:08 2005 > > New Revision: 329053 > > > > URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?rev=3D329053&view=3Drev > > Log: > > Implementation of commons-logging that doesn't use any discovery or > > tricks, just plain java.util.logging. > > > > There is a trick actually - at startup it'll try to load a different > > handler ( without 2-lines logs ) and a different config ( from classpat= h > > like log4j ). I'll probably remove this later, but I can't stand the > > default handler and behavior > > I'm ok with including your formatter in the JULI bundle, and using it in > the default configuration (the one which is in conf/logging.properties). I've been wondering - was is the reason for having JULI as a separate module ? It would fit well under util/. If JDK1.4 is the concern - exclude is pretty easy, there are other files depending on 1.4 or even 1.5 in the tree. Costin --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@tomcat.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@tomcat.apache.org