Mailing-List: contact dev-help@tomcat.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: "Tomcat Developers List" <dev@tomcat.apache.org>
Received-SPF: neutral (hermes.apache.org: local policy)
Date: Mon, 24 Oct 2005 10:24:52 -0500
From: Glenn Nielsen <glenn@mail.more.net>
To: Tomcat Developers List <dev@tomcat.apache.org>
Subject: Re: [JK] Status -- was [VOTE] JK 1.2.15
Message-ID: <20051024152452.GS20296@gkar.earthdome.org>
References: <43579106.7050708@apache.org> <4357E30C.30503@rowe-clan.net>
 <435CDF04.9030503@apache.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <435CDF04.9030503@apache.org>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i

I plan on installing 1.2.15 on FreeBSD 5.3 and Solaris 7 today and
do some minimal testing.

Glenn

On Mon, Oct 24, 2005 at 03:17:56PM +0200, Mladen Turk wrote:
> William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
> >>
> >>Do you guys find something that would prevent 1.2.15 to
> >>be declared as stable that I'm missing?
> >
> >I'll try to find cycles to test myself, next week.  I know I'm having
> >alot of trouble with the apache 1.3 build on odd architectures, probably
> >because the clash of a libtool-based mod_jk.so.1.2 v.s. non-libtool based
> >httpd 1.3.  I'm working on cleaner autoconf against httpd-2.0 already 
> >for building mod_ftp, which will probably apply very cleanly here as well.
> >
> 
> Fine :)
> 
> Anyhow, what should I do, since I've volunteer for a RM?
> I mean, I don't expect to see the 1.3 branch for couple of
> months from now, and the 1.2.14 is unusable on Solaris, so
> we need some action. The 1.2.15 (bugfix) release is the
> only thing that is implementable right now, thought.
> 
> Since there was no reactions to the VOTE either pro or
> contra for more then a mont,
> seems to me we are in a serious problem, because
> the developers/commiter interest is blocking the release.
> The final solution is either to bring that to the tomcat pmc,
> and if there is really zero interest on maintaining mod_jk,
> among the current commiters, it should be either shut down,
> or proposed as a new project with a different set of maintainers.
> 
> Regards,
> Mladen.
> 
> 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@tomcat.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@tomcat.apache.org
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Glenn Nielsen             glenn@more.net | /* Spelin donut madder    |
MOREnet System Programming               |  * if iz ina coment.      |
Missouri Research and Education Network  |  */                       |
----------------------------------------------------------------------

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@tomcat.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@tomcat.apache.org