Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-jakarta-tomcat-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 95582 invoked from network); 7 Oct 2005 14:05:53 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (209.237.227.199) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 7 Oct 2005 14:05:53 -0000 Received: (qmail 87792 invoked by uid 500); 7 Oct 2005 14:05:44 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-jakarta-tomcat-dev-archive@jakarta.apache.org Received: (qmail 87706 invoked by uid 500); 7 Oct 2005 14:05:43 -0000 Mailing-List: contact tomcat-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Unsubscribe: List-Help: List-Post: List-Id: "Tomcat Developers List" Reply-To: "Tomcat Developers List" Delivered-To: mailing list tomcat-dev@jakarta.apache.org Received: (qmail 87493 invoked by uid 99); 7 Oct 2005 14:05:42 -0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.2 required=10.0 tests=NO_REAL_NAME X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [192.87.106.226] (HELO ajax.apache.org) (192.87.106.226) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 07 Oct 2005 07:05:40 -0700 Received: by ajax.apache.org (Postfix, from userid 99) id 100A821F; Fri, 7 Oct 2005 16:05:20 +0200 (CEST) From: bugzilla@apache.org To: tomcat-dev@jakarta.apache.org Subject: DO NOT REPLY [Bug 36883] - mod_proxy_ajp and tomcat issues X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC Message-Id: <20051007140520.100A821F@ajax.apache.org> Date: Fri, 7 Oct 2005 16:05:20 +0200 (CEST) X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org X-Spam-Rating: minotaur.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG� RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND� INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36883 ------- Additional Comments From rpluem@apache.org 2005-10-07 16:05 ------- Created an attachment (id=16619) --> (http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=16619&action=view) Patch against Tomcat 5.5.9 After doing some further tests and further analysis I must revert my earlier assumption that this is a httpd bug. It rather seems that org.apache.ajp.RequestHandler does not honour the isSSL bit inside an ajp message correctly. Attached is a patch against Tomcat 5.5.9 that should fix this. -- Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: tomcat-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: tomcat-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org