tomcat-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From bugzi...@apache.org
Subject DO NOT REPLY [Bug 36883] - mod_proxy_ajp and tomcat issues
Date Fri, 07 Oct 2005 14:40:18 GMT
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
<http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36883>.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36883





------- Additional Comments From william.barker@wilshire.com  2005-10-07 16:40 -------
(In reply to comment #7)
> Created an attachment (id=16619)
 --> (http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=16619&action=view) [edit]
> Patch against Tomcat 5.5.9
> After doing some further tests and further analysis I must revert my earlier
> assumption that this is a httpd bug. It rather seems that
> org.apache.ajp.RequestHandler does not honour the isSSL bit inside an ajp
> message correctly. Attached is a patch against Tomcat 5.5.9 that should fix
> this.

The first patch of mod_proxy_ajp is sub-optimal, but will work.  It would be 
better if mod_proxy_ajp honored the is_ssl flag and didn't bother to check the 
SSL attributes unless it was set.

Your patch of Tomcat isn't even worth vetoing, since the patched class doesn't 
exist in 5.5.x, and is deprecated in 4.1.x.


-- 
Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: tomcat-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: tomcat-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org


Mime
View raw message