Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-jakarta-tomcat-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 80989 invoked from network); 7 Sep 2005 22:18:46 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (209.237.227.199) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 7 Sep 2005 22:18:46 -0000 Received: (qmail 8688 invoked by uid 500); 7 Sep 2005 22:18:44 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-jakarta-tomcat-dev-archive@jakarta.apache.org Received: (qmail 7712 invoked by uid 500); 7 Sep 2005 22:18:41 -0000 Mailing-List: contact tomcat-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Unsubscribe: List-Help: List-Post: List-Id: "Tomcat Developers List" Reply-To: "Tomcat Developers List" Delivered-To: mailing list tomcat-dev@jakarta.apache.org Received: (qmail 7699 invoked by uid 99); 7 Sep 2005 22:18:41 -0000 Received: from asf.osuosl.org (HELO asf.osuosl.org) (140.211.166.49) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 07 Sep 2005 15:18:41 -0700 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=10.0 tests= X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (asf.osuosl.org: local policy) Received: from [212.27.42.29] (HELO smtp3-g19.free.fr) (212.27.42.29) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 07 Sep 2005 15:18:53 -0700 Received: from [192.168.0.1] (gounod-2-82-224-99-120.fbx.proxad.net [82.224.99.120]) by smtp3-g19.free.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id F1343CB86 for ; Thu, 8 Sep 2005 00:18:38 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <431F6740.9090408@apache.org> Date: Thu, 08 Sep 2005 00:18:40 +0200 From: Remy Maucherat User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.6 (Windows/20050716) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Tomcat Developers List Subject: Re: DO NOT REPLY [Bug 36541] - session getAttribute/setAttribute and removeAttribute are NOT Thread safe. References: <20050907214327.7531634C@ajax.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <20050907214327.7531634C@ajax.apache.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org X-Spam-Rating: minotaur.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N bugzilla@apache.org wrote: > DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG� > RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT > . > ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND� > INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. > > http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36541 > > > > > > ------- Additional Comments From rcdunn@rcdunn.com 2005-09-07 23:43 ------- > I strongly agree with Craig, et al to error on the side of a more robust implemention by using > synchronization on the side of Tomcat. I think doing otherwise would be doing a high-wire act without a > net. There are too many places for a developer to miss handling the threading correctly to leave this as is. Somehow, I cannot access bugzilla right now. DNS failure or something. Can someone close this as invalid and end this pointless debate ? Otherwise, I'll do it first thing when I have access :) Thanks, R�my --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: tomcat-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: tomcat-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org