Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-jakarta-tomcat-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 12511 invoked from network); 22 Sep 2005 19:06:10 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (209.237.227.199) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 22 Sep 2005 19:06:10 -0000 Received: (qmail 50256 invoked by uid 500); 22 Sep 2005 19:06:04 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-jakarta-tomcat-dev-archive@jakarta.apache.org Received: (qmail 50216 invoked by uid 500); 22 Sep 2005 19:06:04 -0000 Mailing-List: contact tomcat-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Unsubscribe: List-Help: List-Post: List-Id: "Tomcat Developers List" Reply-To: "Tomcat Developers List" Delivered-To: mailing list tomcat-dev@jakarta.apache.org Received: (qmail 50202 invoked by uid 99); 22 Sep 2005 19:06:04 -0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.2 required=10.0 tests=NO_REAL_NAME X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [192.87.106.226] (HELO ajax.apache.org) (192.87.106.226) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 22 Sep 2005 12:06:03 -0700 Received: by ajax.apache.org (Postfix, from userid 99) id 6463DDF; Thu, 22 Sep 2005 21:05:42 +0200 (CEST) From: bugzilla@apache.org To: tomcat-dev@jakarta.apache.org Subject: DO NOT REPLY [Bug 33453] - Jasper should recompile JSP files whose datestamps change in either direction (not just newer) X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo Message-Id: <20050922190542.6463DDF@ajax.apache.org> Date: Thu, 22 Sep 2005 21:05:42 +0200 (CEST) X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org X-Spam-Rating: minotaur.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG� RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND� INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33453 ------- Additional Comments From jamie@white-mountain.org 2005-09-22 21:05 ------- Since when is it a good idea to *close* a bug that you can't think of how to fix offhand, and don't feel like fixing yourself? This behavior is infantile and is an embarassing contradiction to the spirit of the open source development model. And now you're refusing to look at a patch just to save face? This is really sad. I wonder how many other Tomcat bugs exist but were closed because somebody didn't want to think about them or try to resolve them. Maybe you ought to use the priority and target milestone features instead of pretending that Tomcat does the right thing because whatever it currently does defines what "the right thing" is. I'm not going to reopen this because I'm not wasting any more time on this little power game. There are competitors to Tomcat and this is just another reason to use them instead. -- Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: tomcat-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: tomcat-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org