tomcat-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Peter Rossbach ...@objektpark.de>
Subject Re: Releasing JK 1.2.15
Date Fri, 23 Sep 2005 15:29:16 GMT
Yes,

is is only a real problem when workers are grouped inside an domain. I have
check this many times and without the lb_value change loadbalancing works as
I aspected, and with it not.
I also think that we need a real lb concept check. Greater changes can 
we better realize after jk 2.1.15.
But this little change was very helpful at some of my production 
customers sites :-)

Peter

Mladen Turk schrieb:

> Peter Rossbach wrote:
>
>> Hey Mladen,
>>
>> can we also integrate the better domain loadbalancer support at 
>> jk_lb_worker.c?
>> I think that we don't change the lb_value inside sticky mode at every 
>> request.
>
>
> Yes we do. They will be updated only for domain workers.
> This is needed to load balance between the workers that are
> members of the same domain. In other case the total_factor will
> be zero and lb_value will not be changed.
>
>
> Regards,
> Mladen.
>
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: tomcat-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: tomcat-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org
>
>
>
>




---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: tomcat-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: tomcat-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org


Mime
View raw message