tomcat-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From bugzi...@apache.org
Subject DO NOT REPLY [Bug 35959] - mod_jk not independant of UseCanonicalName
Date Mon, 01 Aug 2005 08:31:37 GMT
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
<http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35959>.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35959





------- Additional Comments From skoehler@upb.de  2005-08-01 10:31 -------
Section 14.2.16 doesn't say anything, how this data is obtained - for example
whether the result of getLocalName() is obtained by a DNS-reverselookup or by
using the host-header or the name of the host like it is stored in tomcat's config.

Well, there's no secure source for that _except_ a reverselookup. The
host-header isn't reliable, so why should the data send by mod_jk be? Well, it
isn't, since mod_jk sends the host-header if UseCanonicalName iss off and sends
the ServerName of apache's vhost if UseCanonicalName is enabled.

So where's you're point?

-- 
Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: tomcat-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: tomcat-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org


Mime
View raw message