tomcat-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Remy Maucherat <r...@apache.org>
Subject Re: New tag ?
Date Mon, 25 Jul 2005 11:28:28 GMT
Jason Brittain wrote:
> On 7/23/05, Mark Thomas <markt@apache.org> wrote:
> 
>>I have been doing some quick tests and my totally unscientific,
>>statistically invalid results are that cvs annotate seems to be about 7
>>to 8 times faster than svn blame (50s compared with 7s) and cvs log
>>seems to be about 2 to 3 times faster than svn log (16s compared to 7s).
> 
> 
> I've heard the subversion developers remind people that there are at least a few
> different network protocols for accessing svn.  In the http:// case,
> it will be the
> slowest.  IIRC they say using the svn:// protocol is the fastest.  It looks
> as if the Apache svn installation does not support svn:// URLs.  The page that
> shows the URLs doesn't mention it:
> 
> http://jakarta.apache.org/site/cvsindex.html#Subversion
> 
> And when I try to connect to the svn port (tcp 3690) I get a connection refused.
> So, maybe the infrastructure people could set up a svnserve server as well as
> serving these repositories through Apache httpd?
> 
> http://svnbook.red-bean.com/en/1.1/ch06s03.html
> 
> I use svn and I'm looking forward to having Tomcat hosted in it.
> 
> Remy: isn't "svn blame" what you're looking for?

I have looked a little at the command line tool now. It's actually more 
like the regular "svn log". It looks like the thing missing is good UI 
support.

It indeed seems a bit sluggish overall, but it's very usable :)

Rémy

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: tomcat-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: tomcat-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org


Mime
View raw message