Mailing-List: contact tomcat-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: "Tomcat Developers List" <tomcat-dev@jakarta.apache.org>
Received-SPF: pass (asf.osuosl.org: local policy)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Subject: RE: Domino Tomcat Redirector
Date: Mon, 20 Jun 2005 08:47:25 -0700
Message-ID: <0dc07661c45a7600a9cadb4147d1860542b6e509@mail.iceboxllc.com>
From: "Kevin Convy \(Contractor\)" <Kevin@iceboxllc.com>
To: "Tomcat Developers List" <tomcat-dev@jakarta.apache.org>


> -----Original Message-----
> From: Mladen Turk [mailto:mturk@apache.org]=20
> Sent: Friday, June 17, 2005 12:53 PM
> To: Tomcat Developers List
> Subject: Re: Domino Tomcat Redirector
>=20
>=20
> Well, frankly I don't mind to have a support for XYZ server,=20
> if at least that server is maintained by the publisher itself.
>=20
> For example, I'll (personally) drop a support even for
> SunOne (Netscape), simply because my 6 month free license=20
> just went out.
>=20
=20
Are there currently any other active maintainers of the nsapi(SunOne)
connector? Has the idea of dropping support for nsapi been on the table
for awhile?

I have only been following this list for a few weeks because of an issue
I have been having with a SunOne-Tomcat configuration, so I apologize if
a marginal future for the nsapi connector is already well understood.

Kevin Convy

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: tomcat-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: tomcat-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org