tomcat-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Tim Funk <funk...@joedog.org>
Subject Re: Initial apr results
Date Thu, 02 Jun 2005 10:41:09 GMT
Excellent. In my future tests, I'll keep the concurrency lower and the hits 
higher. I'll also use different size files. I am only able to use a 1.4.2 
JVM. I might be able to get 1.5 on - but its highly doubtful.

-Tim

Remy Maucherat wrote:
> Tim Funk wrote:
> 
>> My test box was an HP-UX 9000/800/L1000-44 - Dual CPU (440 MHz)
>>
>> On my initial tests with the APR connector - the APR connector 
>> "seemed" slower the "old" http connector. But the difference is mild 
>> and my initial numbers are flaky. On the same hardware - I am running 
>> 6 other instances (of different versions) of tomcat at the same time 
>> which may be throwing my numbers off.
>>
>> During some slow time - I might be able to take most of them down and 
>> run some more tests to try to ensure I am hogging all the resources to 
>> the box and not sharing them.
>>
>> For those curious - for /tomcat.gif - my requests per second range 
>> anywhere from 1200+ to 5000+ - Due to such a large range - I have no 
>> confidence in my numbers so far to reach any conclusion.
>>
>> I was using the command:
>>  /usr/local/httpd/bin/ab -n 1000 -c 100 -k 
>> http://myserver:8090/tomcat.gif
>>
>> With keepalive off - I was still easily over 1000 requests per second 
>> for tomcat.gif.
> 
> 
> I can't assert yet that there are no bugs at the moment (performance or 
> otherwise). So far, performance seems good on Windows, and Linux. To 
> give a comparison on Windows with this test, APR HTTP is within 5% of 
> regular HTTP, and gets closer depending on the JVM (I suppose if it's 
> better at JNI - I've noticed slightly better results with Sun JDK 1.5 
> Server compared to 1.4.2 client).
> 
> I think you should use -n 20000 at least: if the test duration is too 
> small, ab is going to produce random results. In this test, increasing 
> concurrency isn't particularly useful either.
> 
> Obviously, the results of this kind of testing are not really important 
> as long as the results stay relatively close (for example, I think the 
> -25% result I got when using polling exclusively was really good).
> 

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: tomcat-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: tomcat-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org


Mime
View raw message