Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-jakarta-tomcat-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 50719 invoked from network); 24 May 2005 18:37:47 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (209.237.227.199) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 24 May 2005 18:37:47 -0000 Received: (qmail 35775 invoked by uid 500); 24 May 2005 18:37:41 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-jakarta-tomcat-dev-archive@jakarta.apache.org Received: (qmail 35749 invoked by uid 500); 24 May 2005 18:37:40 -0000 Mailing-List: contact tomcat-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Unsubscribe: List-Help: List-Post: List-Id: "Tomcat Developers List" Reply-To: "Tomcat Developers List" Delivered-To: mailing list tomcat-dev@jakarta.apache.org Received: (qmail 35735 invoked by uid 99); 24 May 2005 18:37:40 -0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.2 required=10.0 tests=NO_REAL_NAME X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (hermes.apache.org: local policy) Received: from sw3.lexmark.com (HELO sw3.lexmark.com) (192.146.101.72) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.28) with ESMTP; Tue, 24 May 2005 11:37:39 -0700 Subject: Re: Adding working dynamically with mod_jk status? To: "Tomcat Developers List" X-Mailer: Lotus Notes Release 5.0.12 February 13, 2003 Message-ID: From: dhay@lexmark.com Date: Tue, 24 May 2005 14:36:41 -0400 X-MIMETrack: Serialize by Router on smtp5b/Lex/Lexmark (Release 5.0.12 |February 13, 2003) at 05/24/2005 02:37:29 PM MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" X-Virus-Checked: Checked X-Spam-Rating: minotaur.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N Any ideas or recommendations on this? cheers, David |---------+----------------------------> | | dhay@lexmark.com | | | | | | 05/23/2005 04:46 | | | PM | | | Please respond to| | | "Tomcat | | | Developers List" | | | | |---------+----------------------------> >---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| | | | To: "Tomcat Developers List" | | cc: | | Subject: Re: Adding working dynamically with mod_jk status? | >---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| Hi Mladen, Sure...we have a system that uses multiple Tomcats (with Apache/mod_jk upfront, of course). We would like to make it easy for the user to add another server to the mix. Hence, we'd like to add the new worker to the Apache config programmatically (we'd like to be able to delete them too, if they cut down the number of servers they're using. I think we can just stop it using the status app.) Would it be easy to add to the status code? Comments? cheers, David |---------+----------------------------> | | Mladen Turk | | | | | | | | | 05/23/2005 04:31 | | | PM | | | Please respond to| | | "Tomcat | | | Developers List" | | | | |---------+----------------------------> >---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| | | | To: Tomcat Developers List | | cc: | | Subject: Re: Adding working dynamically with mod_jk status? | >---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| dhay@lexmark.com wrote: > Hi, > > Is there any way in the current implementatio to **add** a new worker (for > a new Tomcat instance) dynamically? Using mod_jk status? Another way? > No. Can you elaborate why would you need such a feature? Regards, Mladen. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: tomcat-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: tomcat-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: tomcat-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: tomcat-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: tomcat-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: tomcat-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org