Mailing-List: contact tomcat-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: "Tomcat Developers List" <tomcat-dev@jakarta.apache.org>
Received-SPF: neutral (hermes.apache.org: local policy)
Message-ID: <427D8993.2060305@apache.org>
Date: Sun, 08 May 2005 05:37:55 +0200
From: Mladen Turk <mturk@apache.org>
User-Agent: Mozilla
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Tomcat Developers List <tomcat-dev@jakarta.apache.org>
Subject: Re: [ANN/VOTE] JK 1.2.12 Released
References: <427CEB8A.4050004@apache.org>
 <6.2.1.2.2.20050507113501.068d08e0@pop3.rowe-clan.net>
In-Reply-To: <6.2.1.2.2.20050507113501.068d08e0@pop3.rowe-clan.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
> 
> It is NOT a release.
>

Sure it is not. That's why there is a VOTE inside, and
that's why it was posted only on the dev list.
Perhaps I should subject that email as:
'1.2.12 tarballs available for testing'.

We are speaking about that for more then a month.
There was a stability vote for 1.2.11 and passed, but was
not released even enough votes collected, because of bug
in wc_close, manifesting in multi vhost scenarios.

So instead just fixing that and re-releasing that should
be done, there was a week left for any other findings.


> Please, do not let this occur again.  If I missed a vote due to
> connectivity issues; please, pardon the reminder of this policy.
>

I really don't see what is your problem with releasing JK.
You can or can not file your vote for this release.
Further more you can even be a RM for the next one. I'm really sick
an tired of doing that for the last year.


Regards,
Mladen.

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: tomcat-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: tomcat-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org