Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-jakarta-tomcat-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 17088 invoked from network); 25 Apr 2005 04:59:47 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (209.237.227.199) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 25 Apr 2005 04:59:47 -0000 Received: (qmail 50985 invoked by uid 500); 25 Apr 2005 05:00:07 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-jakarta-tomcat-dev-archive@jakarta.apache.org Received: (qmail 50930 invoked by uid 500); 25 Apr 2005 05:00:07 -0000 Mailing-List: contact tomcat-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Help: List-Post: List-Id: "Tomcat Developers List" Reply-To: "Tomcat Developers List" Delivered-To: mailing list tomcat-dev@jakarta.apache.org Received: (qmail 50915 invoked by uid 99); 25 Apr 2005 05:00:06 -0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.2 required=10.0 tests=FORGED_YAHOO_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (hermes.apache.org: domain of jak-tomcat-dev@m.gmane.org designates 80.91.229.2 as permitted sender) Received: from main.gmane.org (HELO ciao.gmane.org) (80.91.229.2) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.28) with ESMTP; Sun, 24 Apr 2005 22:00:06 -0700 Received: from list by ciao.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.43) id 1DPvbo-0003Qp-EF for tomcat-dev@jakarta.apache.org; Mon, 25 Apr 2005 06:54:12 +0200 Received: from adsl-63-201-228-18.dsl.snfc21.pacbell.net ([63.201.228.18]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Mon, 25 Apr 2005 06:54:12 +0200 Received: from cmanolache by adsl-63-201-228-18.dsl.snfc21.pacbell.net with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Mon, 25 Apr 2005 06:54:12 +0200 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: tomcat-dev@jakarta.apache.org From: Costin Manolache Subject: Re: cvs commit: jakarta-tomcat-catalina/catalina/src/share/org/apache/catalina/authenticator AuthenticatorBase.java Date: Sun, 24 Apr 2005 21:59:07 -0700 Lines: 29 Message-ID: References: <20050418202157.30912.qmail@minotaur.apache.org> <42642118.7060707@apache.org> <426428D6.50700@Apache.org> <42642A84.6020500@apache.org> <4264302F.9050905@Apache.org> <4264347B.5080400@apache.org> <42644483.9000804@Apache.org> <4264D056.5050605@apache.org> <4265047A.1090204@Apache.org> <426505A5.4040507@apache.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: adsl-63-201-228-18.dsl.snfc21.pacbell.net User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.2 (Macintosh/20050317) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en In-Reply-To: <426505A5.4040507@apache.org> Sender: news X-Virus-Checked: Checked X-Spam-Rating: minotaur.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N Remy Maucherat wrote: > Keith Wannamaker wrote: > >> If no one else is concerned that Tomcat 5.5 doesn't work by default > > > Any other nonsensical statement to make ? The only thing that does not > work is opening third party documents from the website, due to IE's > broken handling of this. > > How about a) going whining at M$ instead ? b) using appropriate > configuration. > > Your veto is completely invalid anyway. IE is still (unfortunately) the browser used by a lot of people, and if there is a way to work around IE brokeness - I think it's a good idea to do it. Complaining to M$ doesn't work - people will just end up buying IIS instead :-) Seriously, not sure why is the veto invalid - if the choice is between having it working for 90% of the people and doing it 'right' - it is worth probably more discussion and a pragmatic decision :-) I would vote for fixing it for the 90% of people - at least until IE gets down to some 49%. Costin --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: tomcat-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: tomcat-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org