Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-jakarta-tomcat-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 53171 invoked from network); 10 Apr 2005 06:44:38 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (209.237.227.199) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 10 Apr 2005 06:44:38 -0000 Received: (qmail 54784 invoked by uid 500); 10 Apr 2005 06:44:32 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-jakarta-tomcat-dev-archive@jakarta.apache.org Received: (qmail 54761 invoked by uid 500); 10 Apr 2005 06:44:32 -0000 Mailing-List: contact tomcat-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Help: List-Post: List-Id: "Tomcat Developers List" Reply-To: "Tomcat Developers List" Delivered-To: mailing list tomcat-dev@jakarta.apache.org Received: (qmail 54748 invoked by uid 99); 10 Apr 2005 06:44:32 -0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.4 required=10.0 tests=DNS_FROM_RFC_ABUSE,RCVD_BY_IP,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (hermes.apache.org: domain of henri.gomez@gmail.com designates 64.233.184.197 as permitted sender) Received: from wproxy.gmail.com (HELO wproxy.gmail.com) (64.233.184.197) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.28) with ESMTP; Sat, 09 Apr 2005 23:44:30 -0700 Received: by wproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id 55so389521wri for ; Sat, 09 Apr 2005 23:44:28 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:references; b=mYKCdI8pyMYxsR4dGEbix4Q0aH80wWuAaL5qD0XOcprQjMkQVpKb3LaQXr4gO9qcTprtgNY4hwDHueV+IHNNMQ8l3jUokQW2YxbJNWIyaNyA99yYHnLkvXsHA/o2tMwcgba+ZNHlcaVr/XrGujhFTwOj48BaXfNPFIsVHmTpiuk= Received: by 10.54.63.10 with SMTP id l10mr1360877wra; Sat, 09 Apr 2005 23:44:28 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.54.47.55 with HTTP; Sat, 9 Apr 2005 23:44:28 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <6291fc85050409234474b9e698@mail.gmail.com> Date: Sun, 10 Apr 2005 08:44:28 +0200 From: Henri Gomez Reply-To: hgomez@apache.org To: Tomcat Developers List Subject: Re: [VOTE] 5.5.9 Stability In-Reply-To: <425824E0.9020005@apache.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable References: <200504091544.j39FiH0Z023001@outgoing.mit.edu> <425824E0.9020005@apache.org> X-Virus-Checked: Checked X-Spam-Rating: minotaur.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N I voted it stable but I'm not using clustering support :( On Apr 9, 2005 8:54 PM, Remy Maucherat wrote: > Yoav Shapira wrote: > > Hi, > > > >>>Ok, this give me and Filip time for real stability testing and review > >>>the 5.5.10 codebase. > >>>I also package my fixes to the 5.5.9 codebase for some test user as bu= g > >>>report.. > >> > >>I'll let Yoav decide what he wants to do with all these builds before h= e > >>gets married (congratulations ;)). I'm very happy to not be the release > >>manager and have to make the tough decisions :) Go Yoav ! > > > > Peter, when you have a Bugzilla item and a cluster fix/test package att= ached > > to that item, please let us know. At that time I'll send out the vote > > results, calling 5.5.9 beta and nothing that this issue (and I'll provi= de a > > link to bugzilla) is the only thing preventing 5.5.9 from being stable,= and > > that users not needing/using clustering should consider 5.5.9 stable. >=20 > Good. >=20 > The vote still does count though: since it is not a regression nor a > security issue, if there are three committers who vote stable, then it's > stable. Of course, it won't happen, as nobody ever cares about voting ;) >=20 > R=E9my >=20 > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: tomcat-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: tomcat-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org >=20 > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: tomcat-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: tomcat-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org