Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-jakarta-tomcat-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 60318 invoked from network); 27 Apr 2005 20:08:10 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (209.237.227.199) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 27 Apr 2005 20:08:10 -0000 Received: (qmail 65585 invoked by uid 500); 27 Apr 2005 20:08:59 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-jakarta-tomcat-dev-archive@jakarta.apache.org Received: (qmail 65390 invoked by uid 500); 27 Apr 2005 20:08:58 -0000 Mailing-List: contact tomcat-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Help: List-Post: List-Id: "Tomcat Developers List" Reply-To: "Tomcat Developers List" Delivered-To: mailing list tomcat-dev@jakarta.apache.org Received: (qmail 65375 invoked by uid 99); 27 Apr 2005 20:08:58 -0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.2 required=10.0 tests=NO_REAL_NAME X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from ajax-1.apache.org (HELO ajax.apache.org) (192.87.106.226) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.28) with ESMTP; Wed, 27 Apr 2005 13:08:58 -0700 Received: by ajax.apache.org (Postfix, from userid 99) id 896BF2DF; Wed, 27 Apr 2005 22:07:57 +0200 (CEST) From: bugzilla@apache.org To: tomcat-dev@jakarta.apache.org Subject: DO NOT REPLY [Bug 34643] - document how to use certificate-based "clientAuth" on a per user or per session basis X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo Message-Id: <20050427200757.896BF2DF@ajax.apache.org> Date: Wed, 27 Apr 2005 22:07:57 +0200 (CEST) X-Virus-Checked: Checked X-Spam-Rating: minotaur.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG� RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND� INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34643 ------- Additional Comments From mario@ops.co.at 2005-04-27 22:07 ------- > You probably want an LDAP-based trustStore (e.g. > java.security.cert.LDAPCertStoreParameters). Not hard to implement (at least > for JDK 1.5), but so far there hasn't been much demand for it. I have already done this http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=7831 but I dont know how well this version works. Though I still use it and can reattach my latest version if wanted. I dont understand why there is so little demand for it, but maybe the time for it might come. -- Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: tomcat-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: tomcat-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org