Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-jakarta-tomcat-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 40487 invoked from network); 8 Apr 2005 07:34:39 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (209.237.227.199) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 8 Apr 2005 07:34:39 -0000 Received: (qmail 88490 invoked by uid 500); 8 Apr 2005 07:34:25 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-jakarta-tomcat-dev-archive@jakarta.apache.org Received: (qmail 88446 invoked by uid 500); 8 Apr 2005 07:34:25 -0000 Mailing-List: contact tomcat-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Help: List-Post: List-Id: "Tomcat Developers List" Reply-To: "Tomcat Developers List" Delivered-To: mailing list tomcat-dev@jakarta.apache.org Received: (qmail 88432 invoked by uid 99); 8 Apr 2005 07:34:24 -0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.2 required=10.0 tests=NO_REAL_NAME X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from ajax-1.apache.org (HELO ajax.apache.org) (192.87.106.226) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.28) with ESMTP; Fri, 08 Apr 2005 00:34:23 -0700 Received: by ajax.apache.org (Postfix, from userid 99) id 936E02CB; Fri, 8 Apr 2005 09:34:20 +0200 (CEST) From: bugzilla@apache.org To: tomcat-dev@jakarta.apache.org Subject: DO NOT REPLY [Bug 34361] - Using Manager ant tasks is messy X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo Message-Id: <20050408073420.936E02CB@ajax.apache.org> Date: Fri, 8 Apr 2005 09:34:20 +0200 (CEST) X-Virus-Checked: Checked X-Spam-Rating: minotaur.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG� RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND� INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34361 ------- Additional Comments From daniel.santos@pobox.com 2005-04-08 09:34 ------- > PS: I have test it and currently a shorter classpath is enough :-) hmm. You might want to check your CLASSPATH, $ANT_HOME/lib and ANT_ARGS (for -lib statments) maybe. When I ran it, it needed classes for JspC. Oh wait, I may have run it against 5.0.28 however. That would be awsome if that's all it needed! :) if that's the case in the nightly then we should be able to get away with: Even if not, we can cause it to have a faster load by isolating the jars that it really needs (catalina-ant.jar plus the ones for JspC). I'll have to experiement with this more after I have slept. Thanks! Daniel -- Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: tomcat-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: tomcat-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org