From tomcat-dev-return-56738-apmail-jakarta-tomcat-dev-archive=jakarta.apache.org@jakarta.apache.org Mon Mar 07 19:01:03 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-jakarta-tomcat-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 44923 invoked from network); 7 Mar 2005 19:01:02 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (209.237.227.199) by minotaur-2.apache.org with SMTP; 7 Mar 2005 19:01:02 -0000 Received: (qmail 27688 invoked by uid 500); 7 Mar 2005 19:00:59 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-jakarta-tomcat-dev-archive@jakarta.apache.org Received: (qmail 26738 invoked by uid 500); 7 Mar 2005 19:00:56 -0000 Mailing-List: contact tomcat-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Help: List-Post: List-Id: "Tomcat Developers List" Reply-To: "Tomcat Developers List" Delivered-To: mailing list tomcat-dev@jakarta.apache.org Received: (qmail 26723 invoked by uid 99); 7 Mar 2005 19:00:56 -0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.1 required=10.0 tests=FORGED_RCVD_HELO X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (hermes.apache.org: local policy) Received: from mail.xnet.hr (HELO pop.xnet.hr) (83.139.64.5) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.28) with ESMTP; Mon, 07 Mar 2005 11:00:55 -0800 Received: from [192.168.0.161] (dh76-52.xnet.hr [83.139.76.52]) by pop.xnet.hr (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id j27Ixiox031488 for ; Mon, 7 Mar 2005 19:59:44 +0100 Message-ID: <422CA4ED.3090900@apache.org> Date: Mon, 07 Mar 2005 20:01:01 +0100 From: Mladen Turk User-Agent: Mozilla X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Tomcat Developers List Subject: Re: Apache 2.1.3 may be beta... References: <6291fc85050307012670245924@mail.gmail.com> <002601c52344$fa471d40$cb37a8c0@bbarkerxp> In-Reply-To: <002601c52344$fa471d40$cb37a8c0@bbarkerxp> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: clamd / ClamAV version 0.71, clamav-milter version 0.71 X-Virus-Status: Clean X-Virus-Checked: Checked X-Spam-Rating: minotaur-2.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N Bill Barker wrote: >> >>It seems Apache 2.1.3 may became beta, what about the state of ajp >>code present in CVS ? > > Well, Gump is still failing to build mod_jk against Apache 2.1.x-dev ;-). > Yep, look at the thread at httpd-dev about making 2.1.3 as beta. First, WIN32 build can not be made because APR build is broken, so you'll need to use the version from CVS. Not sure about other things but there are some heavy discussions (as usual :)) regarding AAA things. Think that APR 1.2.0 will have to be released first. OTOH Apache 2.1/2.2 is pretty cool and IMHO the users will be more willing to accept the 2.0->2.2 transition then 1.3->2.0. Regards, Mladen. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: tomcat-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: tomcat-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org