tomcat-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Alistair Young <alist...@smo.uhi.ac.uk>
Subject Re: mod_jk2
Date Thu, 17 Mar 2005 10:27:30 GMT
ok, that's enlightening!
many thanks,
Alistair

On 17 Mar 2005, at 10:13, Mladen Turk wrote:

> Alistair Young wrote:
>> Was there a reason mod_jk2 was replaced with mod_jk?
>
> Too complex, uses APR that behaves badly with Apache1.3,
> and lot more. Browse the mail archive for further details.
>
>> I found mod_jk2 much easier to use and it's a pity it's gone.
>
> No it is not, but that's kind of personal opinion in any case.
>
>> Is it just looking for a maintainer?
>
> No! Please, I'm tired of JK/JK2 discussions :).
> It's a dead code. There are two active connectors projects
> already mod_jk and mod_proxy for Apache 2.2
>
> When AJP14 protocol gets accepted we'll probably have a third one,
> so that's enough, thought.
>
>> Were there advantages of mod_jk2 over mod_jk?
>
> None.
>
> If you *really* like JK2 code, it's a BSD license, so you can
> do with it what ever you wish, just don't call it Apache or Jakarta.
>
> Regards,
> Mladen.
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: tomcat-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: tomcat-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org
>


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: tomcat-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: tomcat-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org


Mime
View raw message