Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-jakarta-tomcat-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 49106 invoked from network); 14 Feb 2005 23:07:38 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (209.237.227.199) by minotaur-2.apache.org with SMTP; 14 Feb 2005 23:07:38 -0000 Received: (qmail 77415 invoked by uid 500); 14 Feb 2005 23:07:33 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-jakarta-tomcat-dev-archive@jakarta.apache.org Received: (qmail 77394 invoked by uid 500); 14 Feb 2005 23:07:33 -0000 Mailing-List: contact tomcat-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Help: List-Post: List-Id: "Tomcat Developers List" Reply-To: "Tomcat Developers List" Delivered-To: mailing list tomcat-dev@jakarta.apache.org Received: (qmail 77381 invoked by uid 99); 14 Feb 2005 23:07:33 -0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.2 required=10.0 tests=NO_REAL_NAME X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from ajax-1.apache.org (HELO ajax.apache.org) (192.87.106.226) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.28) with ESMTP; Mon, 14 Feb 2005 15:07:32 -0800 Received: from ajax.apache.org (ajax.apache.org [127.0.0.1]) by ajax.apache.org (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id j1EN7Tjl012447 for ; Tue, 15 Feb 2005 00:07:29 +0100 Received: (from nobody@localhost) by ajax.apache.org (8.12.11/8.12.11/Submit) id j1EN7S8S012445; Tue, 15 Feb 2005 00:07:28 +0100 Date: Tue, 15 Feb 2005 00:07:28 +0100 Message-Id: <200502142307.j1EN7S8S012445@ajax.apache.org> From: bugzilla@apache.org To: tomcat-dev@jakarta.apache.org Subject: DO NOT REPLY [Bug 33564] - Servlet Init Params for a jsp cannot be obtained X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo X-Virus-Checked: Checked X-Spam-Rating: minotaur-2.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG� RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND� INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33564 ------- Additional Comments From yoavs@computer.org 2005-02-15 00:07 ------- Un-acceptable? ;) If you were paying Remy before, I suggest you don't do so anymore. Heck, fire him ;) Please... Now, a bit more seriously: As far as I know servlet-name is a require child of the servlet element in the Servlet Specification v2.4. If you look at SRV.13.3, on page 127 of the spec v2.4, there's no minOccurs="0" in the XSD. So here are a couple of things to try with regards to your deployment descriptor: 1. Validate it using an external tool like XMLSpy. 2. Add BlahBlah to your element, and then a corresponding element for BlahBlah in your deployment descriptor. Restart Tomcat and see if the behavior changes: whether it does or doesn't, you can report your findings and at least contradict Remy/William with some evidence rather than "you're shooting from the hip." Another thing that would be helpful is to post a simple WAR we can use to reproduce your testing. Yet another good practice is to use a stable release for testing: 5.5.4 is not a stable Tomcat release IIRC. 5.5.7 is, meaning it passed the TCKs. If I were you, I would (re)test against a stable release. To Bryan's comment: 5.0.x and 5.5.x are different branches of Tomcat with significant relevant code changes. The same advice I gave Bruce above is applicable to you as well. If you could post a WAR of your test setup so that we may reproduce your tests, that'd be good too. -- Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: tomcat-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: tomcat-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org