+0
JK / JK2 are also very specific to our current AJP implemtation.
Maybe they should be called AJP instead ?
PS: Happy New Year to all TC-DEV members :)
On Tue, 11 Jan 2005 10:44:17 +0100, Remy Maucherat <remm@apache.org> wrote:
> (Note: I'm talking about the Java code here)
>
> That code is IMO a bit messy. It's fast (it does its job and seems to
> beat HTTP for proxying) and works, but I think a cleanup won't hurt.
>
> Some of the issues:
> - Deprecation (ex: JkMain is deprecated, supposedly to be replaced, but
> I don't see anything coming, so I think JkMain should be undeprecated)
> - Formatting (I don't quite like this, as it would screw up diffs;
> running some code formetter on that, like Eclipse, wouldn't hurt, though)
> - Many strings refer to "jk2": I plan to replace these with "jk"
>
> Rémy
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: tomcat-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: tomcat-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org
>
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: tomcat-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: tomcat-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org
|