From tomcat-dev-return-53715-apmail-jakarta-tomcat-dev-archive=jakarta.apache.org@jakarta.apache.org Fri Dec 10 17:20:35 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-jakarta-tomcat-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 67079 invoked from network); 10 Dec 2004 17:20:34 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (209.237.227.199) by minotaur-2.apache.org with SMTP; 10 Dec 2004 17:20:34 -0000 Received: (qmail 42736 invoked by uid 500); 10 Dec 2004 17:20:22 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-jakarta-tomcat-dev-archive@jakarta.apache.org Received: (qmail 42697 invoked by uid 500); 10 Dec 2004 17:20:21 -0000 Mailing-List: contact tomcat-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Help: List-Post: List-Id: "Tomcat Developers List" Reply-To: "Tomcat Developers List" Delivered-To: mailing list tomcat-dev@jakarta.apache.org Received: (qmail 42680 invoked by uid 99); 10 Dec 2004 17:20:21 -0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.7 required=10.0 tests=FROM_ENDS_IN_NUMS,HTML_50_60,HTML_MESSAGE X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (hermes.apache.org: local policy) Received: from Unknown (HELO mail2.basistech.net) (199.88.205.1) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.28) with ESMTP; Fri, 10 Dec 2004 09:20:20 -0800 Received: from mail3.basistech.net ([10.1.1.99]) by mail2.basistech.net with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.211); Fri, 10 Dec 2004 12:20:08 -0500 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5.7226.0 Content-class: urn:content-classes:message MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----_=_NextPart_001_01C4DEDC.7FD33885" Subject: 5.0.30 versus 5.0.29 on the main download page Date: Fri, 10 Dec 2004 12:20:08 -0500 Message-ID: X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: Thread-Topic: 5.0.30 versus 5.0.29 on the main download page Thread-Index: AcTe3H+L8jN6NJEmT2ag9kN3eZQmcA== From: "Benson Margulies" To: X-OriginalArrivalTime: 10 Dec 2004 17:20:08.0858 (UTC) FILETIME=[7F9FFFA0:01C4DEDC] X-Virus-Checked: Checked X-Spam-Rating: minotaur-2.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N ------_=_NextPart_001_01C4DEDC.7FD33885 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable The main download page links to the 5.0.30 beta but not to the 5.0.29 stable. This has led to some confusion on the part of customers of mine. Would it be reasonable to always have the latest stable version from each of the maintained branches on that page? =20 ------_=_NextPart_001_01C4DEDC.7FD33885--