tomcat-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Benson Margulies" <bim2...@basistech.com>
Subject RE: 5.0.30 versus 5.0.29 on the main download page
Date Fri, 10 Dec 2004 20:14:51 GMT
Well, I guess I did mean 5.0.28 in that case. 

Another suggestion: couldn't tomcat have its very own download page,
instead of being in the midst of that vast list of jakarta downloads? 

-----Original Message-----
From: Shapira, Yoav [mailto:Yoav.Shapira@mpi.com] 
Sent: Friday, December 10, 2004 12:22 PM
To: Tomcat Developers List
Subject: RE: 5.0.30 versus 5.0.29 on the main download page


Hi,

>The main download page links to the 5.0.30 beta but not to the 5.0.29 
>stable. This has led to some confusion on the part of customers of
mine.
>Would it be reasonable to always have the latest stable version from 
>each of the maintained branches on that page?

5.0.29 is not stable, but maybe you meant 5.0.28 which is.  The download
pages are bears already, but I suppose at this time adding 5.0.28 back
won't do much harm.

Yoav Shapira http://www.yoavshapira.com



This e-mail, including any attachments, is a confidential business
communication, and may contain information that is confidential,
proprietary and/or privileged.  This e-mail is intended only for the
individual(s) to whom it is addressed, and may not be saved, copied,
printed, disclosed or used by anyone else.  If you are not the(an)
intended recipient, please immediately delete this e-mail from your
computer system and notify the sender.  Thank you.


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: tomcat-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: tomcat-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: tomcat-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: tomcat-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org


Mime
View raw message