Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-jakarta-tomcat-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 63931 invoked from network); 28 Oct 2004 14:07:19 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (209.237.227.199) by minotaur-2.apache.org with SMTP; 28 Oct 2004 14:07:19 -0000 Received: (qmail 78539 invoked by uid 500); 28 Oct 2004 14:07:01 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-jakarta-tomcat-dev-archive@jakarta.apache.org Received: (qmail 78435 invoked by uid 500); 28 Oct 2004 14:07:01 -0000 Mailing-List: contact tomcat-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Help: List-Post: List-Id: "Tomcat Developers List" Reply-To: "Tomcat Developers List" Delivered-To: mailing list tomcat-dev@jakarta.apache.org Received: (qmail 78356 invoked by uid 99); 28 Oct 2004 14:06:59 -0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.6 required=10.0 tests=FROM_ENDS_IN_NUMS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (hermes.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [199.88.205.1] (HELO mail2.basistech.net) (199.88.205.1) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.28) with ESMTP; Thu, 28 Oct 2004 07:06:59 -0700 Received: from mail3.basistech.net ([10.1.1.99]) by mail2.basistech.net with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.211); Thu, 28 Oct 2004 10:06:59 -0400 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5.7226.0 Content-class: urn:content-classes:message MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Subject: RE: Two modest proposals about common\lib Date: Thu, 28 Oct 2004 10:06:58 -0400 Message-ID: X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: Thread-Topic: Two modest proposals about common\lib Thread-Index: AcS89Fa6uHPNnhkfQFq0TdFVojyY6QAAuLdA From: "Benson Margulies" To: "Tomcat Developers List" X-OriginalArrivalTime: 28 Oct 2004 14:06:59.0330 (UTC) FILETIME=[63F71E20:01C4BCF7] X-Virus-Checked: Checked X-Spam-Rating: minotaur-2.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N Remy, Can you send me a doc reference to the relevant properties? Maybe a = howto is in order here. If there's already a capability to append = lib/class/endorsed dirs in a prop file, then there's surely no reason to = add some other place to configure the same thing. --benson =20 -----Original Message----- From: Remy Maucherat [mailto:remm@apache.org]=20 Sent: Thursday, October 28, 2004 9:45 AM To: Tomcat Developers List Subject: Re: Two modest proposals about common\lib Tim Funk wrote: > I've been pondering something similar. (I just never got around to=20 > vocalizing it) My preference is to introduce common/usr_lib (and=20 > server/usr_lib)(This name is horrible, but you get the idea) > > The usr_lib dirs would be in the same classloader as common/lib (or > server/lib) and would contain user specific jars. This way users would = > not have to add/change jar files in common/lib when upgrades occur. More problems, more confusion. Bad idea. People can use the properties file to tweak the classloaders if they = need it. R=E9my --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: tomcat-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: tomcat-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: tomcat-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: tomcat-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org