Mailing-List: contact tomcat-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: "Tomcat Developers List" <tomcat-dev@jakarta.apache.org>
Message-ID: <416AA5DC.9080605@apache.org>
Date: Mon, 11 Oct 2004 17:25:16 +0200
From: Remy Maucherat <remm@apache.org>
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 0.8 (Windows/20040913)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Tomcat Developers List <tomcat-dev@jakarta.apache.org>
Subject: Re: JK Todo List
References: <416679F1.50009@apache.org>
	 <00e501c4ad4c$d15a43d0$a3b40704@oemcomputer>	 <4166BEA2.1000002@apache.org>
 <4166C296.70008@apache.org>	 <4166CCEA.90609@apache.org>
 <077601c4ad78$e439cad0$1d0110ac@focus>
 <6291fc85041011011157475553@mail.gmail.com> <cke81q$vc0$1@sea.gmane.org>
In-Reply-To: <cke81q$vc0$1@sea.gmane.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit

Costin Manolache wrote:

> Henri Gomez wrote:
>
>> Well JK using APR will be a good solution for every webservers but 
>> Apache 1.3.x.
>>
>> Apache 2.x came with APR,  IIS, Domino and others should have no
>> problems to use an external APR library (.so, .dll).
>>
>> So the remaining question will be shoud we drop Apache 1.3.x support
>> in future JK 1.2.x or should we start a 'new' APR JK 1.2.x based
>> implementation ?
>
>
>
> Why use APR in mod_jk ?
>
> Support for Apache1.3 is IMO more important than support for IIS. And 
> so far, mod_jk seems to work without any apr - and it is in 
> maintainance mode, so no major changes should be made.

I think good Apache 1.3 support is more important than improving IIS 
support. IIS is not gaining market share these days, and it seems quite 
obvious most of the new IIS 6 installations are going to be used to run 
.not web components.

R�my


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: tomcat-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: tomcat-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org